Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: AI Doctrine Usage  (Read 8372 times)

Offline Analpirat

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #30 on: January 26, 2011, 04:40:35 PM »
I don't see what you're getting at. My point was that any time picked will be either too short or too long for most people. Therefore it is best not to overcomplicate things and refrain from adding a pause feature in an RTS where matches are seldomly over 30-45 min in length.

Offline IJoe

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1025
  • Who controls the present controls the past.
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #31 on: January 26, 2011, 04:44:12 PM »
I don't see what you're getting at. My point was that any time picked will be either too short or too long for most people. Therefore it is best not to overcomplicate things and refrain from adding a pause feature in an RTS where matches are seldomly over 30-45 min in length.

Dude, Afaik, SC2 is the ONLY REAL E-SPORT GAME there is, and thus, if they've got pause there, it is, firstly, for a reason, and secondly, it's PERFECTLY OK.
Well, that's about all the point, I was trying to make.

If you want a picture of the future,
imagine a boot stamping on a human face
— forever.

Offline Analpirat

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #32 on: January 26, 2011, 04:52:38 PM »
Okay, but that's not much of an argument,is it?
Just because Blizzard did it doesn't mean it's good. And even if it fits into SC2 that doesn't mean it'll translate well into CoH. I wouldn't be astounded if that pause was only there for the SC pro haxx0rs to treat their carpal tunnels syndrome because of the ridiculous apm they produce.

Offline IJoe

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1025
  • Who controls the present controls the past.
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #33 on: January 26, 2011, 04:57:42 PM »
We're a bit too far from doctrine usage now, don't you think?
BTW, I had my APM raise to 450 and more at times with 180-220 being the average. It's nothing tough with grid, they introduced in SC2. I mean, it's REALLY easy, for I am not a pro at all.

If you want a picture of the future,
imagine a boot stamping on a human face
— forever.

Offline Jeff 'Robotnik' W.

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
  • Forum historian
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #34 on: January 26, 2011, 07:51:55 PM »
When you say "release", what do you mean? Giving your work to dev, giving a link to everyone, or both...? I will be happy to test the AI, but I need to understand how I should install it.  :)

i will release a link to everyone to test, and then the dev might put it in a patch once the soviet ai is more stable

Offline One-eye

  • Strelky
  • **
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #35 on: January 26, 2011, 08:09:42 PM »
For some reason the AI doesn't go armour doctrine very often, which is odd because if it did as the soviets it would be a really tough opponent even with just the call-ins.

Huh, now i actually think about it i can't remember the last time the A.I bothered to go armoured doctrine.  Actually, i can't remember ANY times the comp has gone armour.  ???
"if there's one thing we've learnt in the last thousand miles of retreat, it's that Russian agriculture is in dire need of mechanisation"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEle_DLDg9Y&

Offline Jeff 'Robotnik' W.

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
  • Forum historian
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #36 on: January 26, 2011, 08:22:03 PM »
updated the ai mod for anyone interested

http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=5018.0

Offline IJoe

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1025
  • Who controls the present controls the past.
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #37 on: January 26, 2011, 08:25:35 PM »
updated the ai mod for anyone interested

http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=5018.0

Thanks a lot, man!
I am used to like your AI  ;D.

If you want a picture of the future,
imagine a boot stamping on a human face
— forever.

Offline Venoxxis

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Keep cool.
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #38 on: January 26, 2011, 09:04:06 PM »
updated the ai mod for anyone interested

http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=5018.0

Thanks a lot, man!
I am used to like your AI  ;D.
Yea indeed very nice to hear that :)
I dont have the time to try it at the moment, its really a shame.

Are they still spaming kat & KV's? even if they dont suicide them?
would really glad to know that, maybe i gonna jump in for a match on sunday.

Actually, i can't remember ANY times the comp has gone armour.  ???
Same here! Something happened to the soviet AI. In earlier releases they loved to go armour.


And guys, please stop spaming this thread. This thread is about playing against the AI. Not about the reason therefore.


best regards

Offline Jeff 'Robotnik' W.

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
  • Forum historian
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #39 on: January 26, 2011, 09:34:25 PM »
I am still trying to limit the ai's use of katyushas and KV2's but i have not been able to implement it for the soviets yet, but so far it working for the other factions doctrine call ins

Offline Venoxxis

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Keep cool.
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #40 on: January 27, 2011, 11:54:18 AM »
I am still trying to limit the ai's use of katyushas and KV2's but i have not been able to implement it for the soviets yet, but so far it working for the other factions doctrine call ins

Okay alright, i gotta try this out ;)
Yet the soviets dont go armour at all.  It would be also a very nice fix to see them going for armour too!


Regards

Offline Red_Stinger

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #41 on: January 27, 2011, 12:15:12 PM »
Just a few thing Robotnik: I guess you are working with the old version of EF (patch 1.2) because as soviet doctrine are still unchanged (GoW still cost 6CP, KV2 is in the last position in urban doctrine...) .

I confirm that soviet still spam katyusha and partisans, but other factions seem to be greatly improved. Thanks for your work!  :)
"Du sublime au ridicule, il n'y a qu'un pas"
-Napoléon Bonaparte

Offline Jeff 'Robotnik' W.

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
  • Forum historian
    • View Profile
Re: AI Doctrine Usage
« Reply #42 on: January 27, 2011, 05:45:29 PM »
Just a few thing Robotnik: I guess you are working with the old version of EF (patch 1.2) because as soviet doctrine are still unchanged (GoW still cost 6CP, KV2 is in the last position in urban doctrine...) .

I confirm that soviet still spam katyusha and partisans, but other factions seem to be greatly improved. Thanks for your work!  :)

strange, as it seems like many of the other parts from 1.3 are working. i will go down the list of changes and double check them then, since i may have missed a few more. i will hopefully release a fix later today, though today is a busy day for me so i cant guarantee it