Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE, OH  (Read 36910 times)

Offline Newbie.

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
  • A single Tiger was worth ten Sherman. I'm the 11th
    • View Profile
Not sure if this is in right place, Lock + move if wanted, MOD's.


US
M4 Sherman Jumbo - Already coming...
M4 105mm Howitzer - Already coming...
M2 Light Tank - Light Tank to Replace the M8 Greyhound, has more armour at the expense of Less speed...
M22 Locust - Light tank to replace the air-dropable 57mm AT Gun...

UK
Comet I - Already coming...
Vickers 6-Tonne Light Tank - Armed with a single .303 inch Vickers MG... Replace M3.
Matilda 2 - Medium Tank to Replace the Churchill Mk. 4.
Sexton - To Replace M7 Priest.

SU
IS-3 - Already coming
SU-122 - Already coming...
SU-76 - Light replacement for T70... Light Tank Destroyer with less armour than the '70...
ZSU-37 - T-34 with a AA Gun ontop... Replaces the T90...
Valentine Mk. 3 - Armed with a 2PDR-6PDR-75MM gun, replace the Lend-Lease Sherman..


WH
- Jagdtiger - Already coming...
- PaK36 - Already Coming...
- Panzerjäger I - Light tank destroyer armed with 47mm Gun.. Replace StuH42
Sturmtiger - Replace Tiger 1.. Armed with 380mm Rocket-laucher.

PE
Jagdpanzer IV - Already coming...
Pz. 35(t) - Replace armoured car... Armed with 37mm Gun +1 MG42 Machine gun... More armour, Better gun, less speed..
Bergetiger - Bergepanzer38(t) - Faster, less armour...

OH
PanzerIII - Captured T34/76
PanzerII/PanzerI - Panzer 38 (t)

Hope everyone agrees to some of them, I'd also say post a few of your own Ideas... Still, Hope the devs notice..

« Last Edit: July 17, 2010, 11:09:30 PM by Newbie. »

Offline Venoxxis

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Keep cool.
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE...
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2010, 11:37:54 AM »
some really good ideas you threw in here.

The M22 locust (airbone tank) is on of the best ideas for a reward unit i heard so far. Good work man. Hopefully the devs will see it ;)



Offline Rikard Blixt

  • Administrator
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1930
  • 'The Fixer'
    • View Profile
    • Eastern Front
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE...
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2010, 11:55:21 AM »
Archer - Tank to replace the Cromwell Command tank... Armed with a 17 Pounder Anti-Tank gun on the back of the tank... Weaker front armour than back...
There's already a replacement for CCT, you can only have 1 reward unit per org unit.
Valar Morghulis
Quote
[CoH:EF-Dev]Walki: BULLSHIT
[CoH:EF-Dev]Walki: I'll eat a tree if this won't work now
[CoH:EF-Dev]Rizz: ok
[CoH:EF-Dev]Rizz: I'll hold you to it
<10 minutes later>
[CoH:EF-Dev]Walki: I think I really gotta eat a tree...
[CoH:EF-Dev]Walki: got a decent one?

Offline SK8ERatWAR

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
  • two million soldiers can't be wrong
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE...
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2010, 01:44:40 PM »
Locust is a nice idea, cool looking little tank!
But the only thing i don't like is the SiG33, it's just toooo UGLY
normally i don't care about looks of tanks but their firepower, but look at this xD:

it looks like it would be blown on it's back when the gun fires!

and another thing i found looking for the m2 is this:

look at the side of the turret, what the hell..? xD

Offline Aouch

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE...
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2010, 03:49:21 PM »
Great suggestions, I like everyone, except the ugly SiG33.

I rather want Brummbär or Sturminfanterigeschütz 33B.
Though the last one would fit better for Ostheer, cause they fought exclusivly in Stalingrad and were also destroyed there.
In memoriam MrScruff
The Wehrmacht in the East

Obstheer FTW!

Offline Strayker

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE...
« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2010, 04:03:17 PM »
I think Archer would be a good reward unit for Firefly...it could be something like mobile 17pdr nest. Slightly better firepower than Firefly, because its a turretless tank destroyer. Maybe even bigger fire range similar to the Marder III and lower cost than Firefly. And i agree that Brummbar would be more suitable than SiG33...which is really an obsolete design in 1945, in which the game takes place. Other suggestions are fine with me.
"There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt..."

Offline Newbie.

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
  • A single Tiger was worth ten Sherman. I'm the 11th
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE...
« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2010, 04:37:14 PM »
I think the Comet 1 is replacing the Firefly..

SiG33.. Well.. the 33B is a bit rare.. Brummbar will probaably go into Ostheer...

Maybe the Sturmtiger? [As thats NOT Going to be in the OH do to realism..]

Offline Seeme

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1880
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE...
« Reply #7 on: July 09, 2010, 04:53:24 PM »
People dont want that tank becuase its ugly?

To tell you the truth, I think the Stug is a very ugly in real life, and super ugly in the gane. That still dosent mean I dont use it.
The Russians think there sooo tough, wait till the Ostheer comes...

Coh Name: Seeme

Offline luz777

  • Donor
  • Commissar
  • *
  • Posts: 425
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE, OH
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2010, 05:26:02 PM »
I'd like to see the Marder III Ausf H as a replacement for the Ausf M that PE have at the moment.

Same functionality but a cooler looking tank and not a stupidly oversized model. Would be nice I think.

Cheers

Offline AbhMkh

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
  • Who Dares Win!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE, OH
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2010, 06:59:37 PM »
The Archer should replace the firefly not the CCT , only a fool would use both fireflies and archers in the game!!!!
The sound of 17 pounder ap shells tearing down panzers

Is music to my ears!!

Offline Newbie.

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
  • A single Tiger was worth ten Sherman. I'm the 11th
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE, OH
« Reply #10 on: July 09, 2010, 07:15:20 PM »
The Archer should replace the firefly not the CCT , only a fool would use both fireflies and archers in the game!!!!

The comet I is replacing the firefly...

Offline AbhMkh

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
  • Who Dares Win!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE, OH
« Reply #11 on: July 10, 2010, 03:50:53 AM »
Allright but my argument still remains the same

Archer should replace firefly whereas comet should replace the cromwell

CCT is fine in itself with option of the staghound
The sound of 17 pounder ap shells tearing down panzers

Is music to my ears!!

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE, OH
« Reply #12 on: July 10, 2010, 06:58:36 AM »
Sturmtiger could be a suitable replacement for both the Tiger I and the hummel.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Jono

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 22
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE, OH
« Reply #13 on: July 10, 2010, 09:02:52 AM »
Firstly good work but dont you think that the panzerjager 1 would be a bit weak to replace stug42

Offline Zerstörer

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1829
  • Listen up knuckleheads!
    • View Profile
Re: Suggestions for Reward units for the UK, US, SU, WH, PE, OH
« Reply #14 on: July 10, 2010, 01:11:21 PM »
Three things guys....

1) We're not going to just stick in 100 reward units, that's not how it works...its not a candy store...

2) To chose a unit it must be able to accomodate the following...must look cool,be able to be modeled and animated correctly,be able to replace a unit in a faction/tech tree without overlaping abilities of other units in the rest of the faction,be as good and balanced as the unit it replaces therefore not making the choice between the two automatic, must not really copy the unit of another faction and finally be able to serve a true purpose in the faction.

3) Historical vehicle abilities and game abilities are totally different things.
A PzII could be made as damaging and resilient as a KT if that meant it would be balanced and serve a purpose.
Therefore arguing how a 2 Pz3s would win vs an IS-2 etc, is a pointless debate
« Last Edit: July 10, 2010, 01:13:35 PM by Zerstörer »
R.I.P MrScruff - A genuine Good Guy and great artist
R.I.P Loran Korn - A very brave and talented guy
RAP NEWS http://thejuicemedia.com/?ref=nf