Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

Author Topic: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil  (Read 26716 times)

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #15 on: January 14, 2010, 09:03:14 PM »

 Super Unit : Automatic no.
 But Luz's proposal is so flawed and filled with limitations
 and requires thought to use, I'd say sure!

 Not like 99% of other offers out there : My super unit that
 requires no thought and is automatic win! :D

 
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline Venoxxis

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Keep cool.
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2010, 07:03:57 PM »
normaly i would say also no to a tank which got build only 2 times.
but the combination of weak armour and superior firepower
is just amazing and would fit kinda great  :o
Logged

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2010, 07:28:36 PM »

 Plus it's 1942 era and historical.
 I mean, goliath were nowhere as common as Vanilla would
 have us believe ;)

 It's not a late 1945-1946 unit like IS4-IS6 :)
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline Venoxxis

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Keep cool.
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2010, 07:48:19 PM »
yarp it would fit perfect.
a tank with a never seen armor piercing ability, and
a huge rage, but a bad armor would be really something
special and it was never seen in any other coh mod else.

go EF!
make it a nice one :D
Logged

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2010, 08:10:21 PM »

 Got to be Doctrine, though.
 And I think 1 max would be best. As 2x Ostheer players
 might spawn 2 each (4 total)... bleep :)

 And it's got to be doctrine :)
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline luz777

  • Donor
  • Commissar
  • *
  • Posts: 425
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #20 on: January 16, 2010, 01:24:04 AM »
Mmm hmm definately doctrine and only 1 and then its gone.

It would best fit as part of the doctrine with the least Anti-Tank speciality, perhaps army group south (assuming thats how were going with Ost) as it would mainly be an urban doctrine focused around Stalingrad...possibly  :)
Logged

Offline Ryousan

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
  • We shall not give up and despair.
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #21 on: January 16, 2010, 10:23:43 AM »
Mmm if It ahs to work like that I imagine it with "Site Main Gun" or something similar, like a very much powerful version of the PE Marder
Logged
My Ostheer Concept Updated: August 26, 2010

http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=4099.0

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #22 on: January 16, 2010, 10:45:40 AM »

 Yup. Site main gun. Super AT88 type Marder (super long
 range). Without the Flak capability, of course.
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline Ryousan

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
  • We shall not give up and despair.
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #23 on: January 16, 2010, 10:50:41 AM »
Yeah that would be awesome...except for the fact it would slightly more vulnerable that an actual 88
Logged
My Ostheer Concept Updated: August 26, 2010

http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=4099.0

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #24 on: January 16, 2010, 11:33:14 AM »

 Well, yea. Xcept AT88 doesn't move. And ought to be
 DELETABLE (PE Flak20 too). GRR
 
 And can be rebuilt multiple times and numerously and... ;)

 ... Can hit planes!
 And probably reloads faster! And... ;)
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline Ryousan

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
  • We shall not give up and despair.
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #25 on: January 16, 2010, 11:41:36 AM »
Ok...nobody is perfect... :P
Logged
My Ostheer Concept Updated: August 26, 2010

http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=4099.0

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2010, 11:42:45 AM »
 ... dude... I'm perfect!!!  8)
 
 Just kidding Ryousan. Actually, I really like your idea.
 I love the idea of a FLAWED super unit. Different from
 what a lot of others proposed :p
« Last Edit: January 17, 2010, 03:10:35 AM by Loupblanc »
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline Venoxxis

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Keep cool.
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2010, 12:17:12 PM »
actully, it should have even more power than the 88.
its weapon isnt a pak43,
its a modified flak 40. this beast could penetrate 150mm of steel at 2000 meters rage. the pak43/88 had worse data.

something like a jeep should be gone with one shot already.

But still we should think about balancing,
so bad reload time,
and bad armor - of course.

the tank sounds really like something unique.

« Last Edit: January 16, 2010, 01:02:55 PM by Venoxxis »
Logged

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #28 on: January 17, 2010, 03:11:11 AM »

 Yea. With it's accumulated maluses, it OUGHT to get
 a pretty nice 'BONUS' to compensate, somewhere, yes?
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline GeneralSatan

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Special Unit: Sturer Emil
« Reply #29 on: January 17, 2010, 10:47:35 AM »
The idea is sound with the possibility of it being a reward vehicle. Otherwise, it seems like a waste of time. Here's another idea i'd like to throw out there: on the EF the Germans had some of those Flak-40/88mm on a wheeled chassis towed behind a a fully stocked halftrack acting as an AT weapon. Is that in the game, or a even a remote possibility?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
« previous next »