Lend and Lease Act

[Prometheus]

Hey are getting the Sovjets some Shermans of the Lend and Lease Act?

And are getting the germans some caputered T-34?

[MrScruff]

Hey are getting the Sovjets some Shermans of the Lend and Lease Act?

And are getting the germans some caputered T-34?

1. no
2. no - or maybe, as a doc-unit

[ford_prefect]

I would love to see a captured T-34 for the Germans

[Bauer]

I think germnas not reay need captured T-34. We know they use this but they have a msses of theyr own tanks.
Some facts:
http://www.achtungpanzer.com/panzerkampfwagen-t-34r-soviet-t-34-in-german-service.htm
T-34 from first picture is great.
 

[SauerKRAUT]

Who wouldn't take a free tank if it works?

[Mr. Someguy]

Lend-Lease as a doctrine would be kinda cool. AT Teams with Bazookas, Call-in Shermans, etc.

[nbeerbower]

I think germnas not reay need captured T-34. We know they use this but they have a msses of theyr own tanks.
Some facts:
http://www.achtungpanzer.com/panzerkampfwagen-t-34r-soviet-t-34-in-german-service.htm [nofollow]
T-34 from first picture is great.

I would love to see the Ostheer have that Flakpanzer.

[SauerKRAUT]

I am not sure if the soviets ever got ahold of zooks but that part of the mod is done anyway they are not gonna change it...

[WartyX]

I have always been strongly opposed to any Lend-Lease ideas. I always wanted our Soviet faction to feel distinctly Soviet - and part of that was by not simply copy-pasting things from the American faction.

[Loupblanc]

 MrScruffs is at the start of this thread
 So many emotions

 

[Zerstörer]

Lend lease stuff are cool as long as they're not the stuff already used by other factions.

Eg. The British built Valentine tank was used by the soviets in large numbers(over 2000 of them) and was very popular with its crews. It was also quite effective.

M3A1 scout car was also used in large numbers.

Also there is no point of using Lend lease stuff when you have the soviet equivalents. Not balance or game terms
anyways. Eg why have churchill when you can put it a KV1?

[Mr. Someguy]

I figured the idea would be that since they were given to you, and not made, you could call them in from off-map if you couldn't spare the resources to make your own.

[hgghg4]

Also there is no point of using Lend lease stuff when you have the soviet equivalents. Not balance or game terms
anyways. Eg why have churchill when you can put it a KV1?

I would rather the KV1, it could damage a panther -_-

[guynumber7]

actually the 76mm F32 on the KV1 was even worse aganist armor then the 6 pdr on the churchill, so no, it probably couldnt.

in real life maybe from the side or rear but from front, lol no.

[Paciat]

actually the 76mm F32 on the KV1 was even worse aganist armor then the 6 pdr on the churchill, so no, it probably couldnt.

in real life maybe from the side or rear but from front, lol no.

Churchills/Cromwells 75mm OQF was also even worse aganist armor then 6lbs.
There were prototype T-34 tanks with Zis-2 guns (57mm) for better armor penetration.