Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: My proposal: Sturmtiger  (Read 3691 times)

Offline huba1212

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
My proposal: Sturmtiger
« on: February 04, 2012, 09:43:27 PM »
Hi, I'm from Poland. I love this EF and I have proposal of make Sturmtiger. It's a very very big rocket-mortar with a tiger chassis. This have very big diameter of mortar and very short barrel. During WW II one time it destroyed three shermans by one shoot only!!! This can be changed with V1 in terror doctrine in wehr or can be changed with normal tiger in blitzkrieg doctrine in wehr. It's very good assault weapon. Link to wikipedia to see this and something more: newbielink:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmtiger [nonactive]

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2012, 09:47:30 PM »
Hi! Welcome to the EF forums :D! (There aren't that man proper greetings these days :P)

Im sorry to burst your bubble :'( but the idea for a Sturmtiger has already been presented and the request has been denied :(. I think one of the main reasons is EF doesn't know where to put it and how to balance it (b/c this is suppose to be like a extension to vCOH).

Even if it replaced the V1, it is still a tank, meaning it can fire more than once. A v1 rocket can only be uesd once :(, per every 10 min or so, and for a high muni price.

EF devs might consider it in the future but I think their main concern is Ostheer and the balancers main concern now is RMC.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2012, 09:49:55 PM by Trannyhunterx »

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline cephalos

  • Mapper
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1367
  • Pick a card...
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2012, 10:15:05 PM »
Witamy rodaka :)

Sturmtiger idea was already answered with 'no' - why? Sturmtiger didn't served on Eastern Front.

Offline Tico_1990

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2012, 11:39:55 PM »
I know that the idea has been rejected for gameplay/balance reasons, but I'd like to point out that the wikipedia link which the OP gave us mentions the fact that the Sturmtiger did operate on the eastern front (warsaw uprising) (and yes, I know wikipedia isn't the greatest of sources).

Offline cephalos

  • Mapper
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1367
  • Pick a card...
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2012, 12:10:11 AM »
I know that the idea has been rejected for gameplay/balance reasons, but I'd like to point out that the wikipedia link which the OP gave us mentions the fact that the Sturmtiger did operate on the eastern front (warsaw uprising) (and yes, I know wikipedia isn't the greatest of sources).

well basically yes, but it was Uprising. It didn't shoot to Soviets, only to Poles... so technically it wasn't Eastern Front.

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2012, 03:52:17 AM »
The only unit I can see the Sturmtiger replacing is the Hummel, because they serve a fairly similar role.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Jeff 'Robotnik' W.

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
  • Forum historian
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2012, 04:06:47 AM »
id rather not have the sturmtiger, its just too extreme of a unit.

Offline huba1212

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2012, 10:17:47 AM »
okay I understood :)

But I see next problem this time in panzer elite. They haven't an universal unit which is base of army. Look: americans have sherman to fight with infantry and tanks, russinas have t-34 also to infantry and panzers, wehrmacht have panzer IV and what have panzerwaffe???

They haven't an universal unit to fight with infantry and tanks:( For me it's small problem, they can make for example panzer III or panzer II which a 50 mm cannon.

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2012, 10:43:13 AM »
Well they have excess amounts of halftracks.
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!

Offline Max 'DonXavi' von B.

  • Developer
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3462
  • Eastern Front forever!
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2012, 11:20:58 AM »
@huba:
That's what PEs playstyle is like. You have to decide for a good mixture of units to fight the enemy successfully. :)

Lemberg - Baraque de Fraiture - Smolensk - Heiligenbeil - Nobel Dynamite Works - Lorient - Poltawa

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2012, 04:20:13 PM »
As I've learned, PE have no one defining unit :(. They need to mix things in order to get an effective hard counter.

For example, a Marder MIGHT be considered a hard counter. But a Marder in itself cant win against say a Sherman. It will get circled and die a horrible death  :'(.

However dual Marders or a Marder and a ATHT or a Marder and some shreck will effectively halt any armored attack, maybe better than a single tank could (granted there's not like 3 shermans charging at you ::))

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2012, 04:49:39 PM »
Thats what teller mines are for.
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2012, 04:53:01 PM »
Teller mines cant really be considered and effective hard counter to armor. You dont always know where the enemy will be and sometimes a tank will just barley mss it. Its too unredictable. But with Marder and ATHT or Marder and Shreck, even if they come from the sides, you are sorta safe.

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Killar

  • Guest
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #13 on: February 05, 2012, 05:07:35 PM »
okay I understood :)

But I see next problem this time in panzer elite. They haven't an universal unit which is base of army. Look: americans have sherman to fight with infantry and tanks, russinas have t-34 also to infantry and panzers, wehrmacht have panzer IV and what have panzerwaffe???

They haven't an universal unit to fight with infantry and tanks:( For me it's small problem, they can make for example panzer III or panzer II which a 50 mm cannon.

You want a mortar vehicle to be a medium tank??

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: My proposal: Sturmtiger
« Reply #14 on: February 05, 2012, 10:55:11 PM »
Can I propose the skin for the Jagdtiger be changed? Its so bland right now :(. Can we at least put this symbl on the side?

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"