Author Topic: Changin some of the reward units for all factions (Read 16867 times)

Tankbuster · « **Reply #75 on:** December 15, 2011, 07:51:41 AM »

Throw an AT grenade at them.

See how they run away

Pac-Fish · « **Reply #76 on:** December 15, 2011, 07:53:25 AM »

Yeah. The sturat will back up when you throw it. And then roll right back where it was

Tankbuster · « **Reply #77 on:** December 15, 2011, 07:56:03 AM »

Then use AT HT, Immobilize them.
Throw an AT grenade at them.
See how they blow up

GodlikeDennis · « **Reply #78 on:** December 15, 2011, 08:56:32 AM »

Stuart, tetrarch and stag are ACs or equivalent. CCT doesn't really count. Brits therefore have 3 tanks: Crom, FF, Churchill. US has 4: Croc, Sherman, M10, Persh.

In EF, Brits also have the Achilles and comet of which one is a reward. US also gains 2 tanks in EF, with 1 as reward and the other replacing a unit that is not a tank (Jumbo-Calli).

Pac-Fish · « **Reply #79 on:** December 15, 2011, 11:48:31 AM »

Well considering how the croc and the basic sherman count as 2 seperte tanks, the Brits theoretically have 5 tanks since each churchill variant does a different thing

Tankbuster · « **Reply #80 on:** December 15, 2011, 03:07:54 PM »

They all support infantry. That is all.

stealthattack1 · « **Reply #81 on:** December 16, 2011, 12:01:16 AM »

it really doesnt matter how many tanks the brits have, i was just suggesting that maybe they dont have that many since i rarely see that many during games.

Pac-Fish · « **Reply #82 on:** December 16, 2011, 12:18:28 AM »

Quote from: stealthattack1 on December 16, 2011, 12:01:16 AM

since i rarely see that many during games.

That in itself is rare

stealthattack1 · « **Reply #83 on:** December 16, 2011, 12:26:49 AM »

well the brits ive had the [irony]pleasure[/irony] of playing against have mostly been campers.

Pac-Fish · « **Reply #84 on:** December 16, 2011, 12:28:49 AM »

IMO its not good to camp it out

. Against higher lvl players you will probably see more tanks. Although I have been paired up with some brit allies (in 2vs2 ofc) who insist on camping one small area. Guess which team loses

Tankbuster · « **Reply #85 on:** December 16, 2011, 08:26:51 AM »

Meh, RMC is way better.

SublimeSnugz · « **Reply #86 on:** December 16, 2011, 10:54:18 AM »

Quote from: Tankbuster on December 16, 2011, 08:26:51 AM

Meh, RMC is way better.

Yea RMC is the 1337 . . . . . .

stealthattack1 · « **Reply #87 on:** December 16, 2011, 07:41:52 PM »

the 1337?? what does that mean?

Pac-Fish · « **Reply #88 on:** December 16, 2011, 11:39:13 PM »

Its some sorta internet term. I never really understood it $:-\$

Max 'DonXavi' von B. · « **Reply #89 on:** December 16, 2011, 11:50:23 PM »

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=1337

Author Topic: Changin some of the reward units for all factions (Read 16867 times)

Tankbuster

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Pac-Fish

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Tankbuster

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

GodlikeDennis

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Pac-Fish

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Tankbuster

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

stealthattack1

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Pac-Fish

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

stealthattack1

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Pac-Fish

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Tankbuster

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

SublimeSnugz

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

stealthattack1

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Pac-Fish

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions

Max 'DonXavi' von B.

Re: Changin some of the reward units for all factions