I see what you are saying. su100 was great and even better than su76. but to balance it, have it called only 2 at a time at a much higher manpower cost, maybe 700. su76 still will have the ap shells while su100 only has its standard cannon. imo choosing the su76 will mean unlimited call ins, ap shells, and its gun has a small traverse. su100 just has a large but effective cannon.
Quote from: trollgore on September 06, 2011, 01:03:57 AMI see what you are saying. su100 was great and even better than su76. but to balance it, have it called only 2 at a time at a much higher manpower cost, maybe 700. su76 still will have the ap shells while su100 only has its standard cannon. imo choosing the su76 will mean unlimited call ins, ap shells, and its gun has a small traverse. su100 just has a large but effective cannon.Let me think.No.Case closed. SU-100 isn't coming back. It's a nice model but we just have way too much stuff.
I see what you are saying. su100 was great and even better than su76. but to balance it, have it called only 2 at a time at a much higher manpower cost, maybe 700.
Quote from: Cranialwizard on September 06, 2011, 01:10:06 AMLet me think.No.Case closed. SU-100 isn't coming back. It's a nice model but we just have way too much stuff.I like how your very frank with your explainations
Let me think.No.Case closed. SU-100 isn't coming back. It's a nice model but we just have way too much stuff.
Quote from: trollgore on September 06, 2011, 01:03:57 AMI see what you are saying. su100 was great and even better than su76. but to balance it, have it called only 2 at a time at a much higher manpower cost, maybe 700.700? More MP cost than a IS-2 or a Panther? You really think this will ballance it?
OSTHEER IS DONE WHEN IT'S DONE!
Actually SU-100 was pretty cool, how cool it would be today IF balanced. But I'll join others - EF doesn't need SU-100 for now.