Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: T-90 vs Puma  (Read 2571 times)

Offline Alexander 'ApeMen' J.

  • Global Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4649
  • Against Jabba and what he has done!
    • View Profile
    • The StarWars Rap :D
T-90 vs Puma
« on: August 12, 2011, 08:42:59 PM »
it seelms like a bad bug but sometimes a t90 can easy kill a 3/4 hp puma with only one salvo.

i had this bug two times now and it looks that the possibility to get this bug increased if the t90 hits the back armor of the puma



Offline Desert_Fox

  • Translator
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 785
    • View Profile
Re: T-90 vs Puma
« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2011, 09:07:47 PM »
T-90?   :o

Offline Alexander 'ApeMen' J.

  • Global Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4649
  • Against Jabba and what he has done!
    • View Profile
    • The StarWars Rap :D
Re: T-90 vs Puma
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2011, 04:59:21 PM »
hehe

yes the t-90
i was also surprised



Offline neosdark

  • Donor
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 805
    • View Profile
Re: T-90 vs Puma
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2011, 05:51:51 PM »
Them some good armor Piercing Rounds they got on the T90, was it Vetted?

Offline Alexander 'ApeMen' J.

  • Global Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4649
  • Against Jabba and what he has done!
    • View Profile
    • The StarWars Rap :D
Re: T-90 vs Puma
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2011, 07:14:27 PM »
no both were without vet
but puma had his upgun upgrade

the next time i have this bug i will save the replay


but i would be nice if you all can take an eye on that about t90 vs puma rear armor



Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: T-90 vs Puma
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2011, 07:19:29 PM »
T90 uses practically the same weapon that the Puma and the PE AC uses. They can be pretty effective when friendly firing sometimes. This is probably a likely occurrence.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.