Definitely a DShk upgrade for the IS-2

[DrRockzo1986]

Well the IS-3 has a, Idk what you call it, rail I guess for a mounted DShk already on it around the main hatch. By the way I just got done playin a match a realized how bland (no offense devs) the IS-2 looks without its MG. And before you guys jump me about how it looks with an mg doesnt matter I got you Im just sayin.

[GodlikeDennis]

I don't know why you're pushing for MGs on the tanks so much. They're fine without them.

[DrRockzo1986]

you're right Ive made my position clear, you guys can discuss it amongst yourselves.
Post Merge: June 16, 2011, 02:45:14 AMSorry I have OCD when it comes to things like that, im like the Adrian Monk of WWII stuff or militaria in general.

[RedGuard]

adrian monk

[GodlikeDennis]

From the tv show Monk. He solves crimes well because of his OCD. I don't watch it either.

[Seeme]

Like he magically knows stuff for a bunch of clues that normal people wouldn't find.

[Andreas 'DMz' Boyce]

How about a lend lease bren carrier with a dhsk, i have one of those ready to go with skin lol

[neosdark]

Lol that would be pretty cool, as a reward unit, i would make that the Soviet MG and replace the Mortar with it, would be pretty cool to see a Bren with a DShk running around suppressing everything

[TheVolskinator]

Lol, if we're wailing on tanks @ MGs: Remove the .50 cal from the Hellcat and give the Wolverine an upgradible .30 cal on the back of the turret-- the Hellcat was rarely equipped with an MG, whilst the more common M10 was commonly used in a role similar to that of the Sherman, most of which were mounted with a .30 caliber MG on the back of the turret (and on some units, a single .50 cal on the mid-righthand side of the turret in addition to the .30)

See how pointless history is in CoH?