Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?  (Read 10013 times)

Offline Hopit

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #15 on: June 20, 2011, 12:01:21 PM »
I'd like to get the trenches back, they fit red army perfectly.

Offline RedGuard

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1014
  • Welcome to Axis Front mod
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #16 on: June 20, 2011, 12:08:13 PM »
It would be nice, I never used them anyway im more of a mobile agressor type. but I dont think we'll see them back :(
Soviet is OP

Offline Desert_Fox

  • Translator
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 785
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #17 on: June 20, 2011, 12:23:30 PM »
I'd like to get the trenches back, they fit red army perfectly.

For nothing...trenches encourage bad gameplay.

Offline Dzierzan

  • Translator
  • Commissar
  • *
  • Posts: 465
  • I am the king of second bananas!
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #18 on: June 20, 2011, 12:23:48 PM »
I'd like to get the trenches back, they fit red army perfectly.

Probably, you were using them to "camp", weren't you? If you like trenchs, go to CW (brits) :).

Offline Mr.ious.Q

  • Allied Commander
  • Guard
  • *
  • Posts: 191
  • Yeah new upgrades
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #19 on: June 21, 2011, 05:18:01 AM »
Uh guys instead of the trenches, you can make the soviet troops to build more simple thing like fox hole.
Who am i?

Offline Desert_Fox

  • Translator
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 785
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #20 on: June 21, 2011, 10:21:49 AM »
Uh guys instead of the trenches, you can make the soviet troops to build more simple thing like fox hole.

But the concept it's the same, camping troops in heavy cover.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2011, 10:47:25 AM by Moonwalker »

Offline RedGuard

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1014
  • Welcome to Axis Front mod
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #21 on: June 21, 2011, 11:45:29 AM »
everyone camps cover its like a part of gameplay - even factions with no trenches, wehr are the worst campers everything goes in cover and then the bunkers MGs mortars and paks come ;D
with brits spanking everyone I think it made the trenches kind of became a target for liquidation

 ashame though cause a lot of players got used to them and fell in love with their trenches.

although I didnt see many good SU players use the trenches much except to rush/abuse with them :P so that contributed to their downfall as well
« Last Edit: June 21, 2011, 11:48:53 AM by RedGuard »
Soviet is OP

Offline Mr.ious.Q

  • Allied Commander
  • Guard
  • *
  • Posts: 191
  • Yeah new upgrades
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #22 on: June 21, 2011, 12:33:58 PM »
So if trenches are not available for building, you can use the fire base to shoot a hole and lay you troops down there- it's easier  ;D
Who am i?

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #23 on: June 21, 2011, 04:05:36 PM »
No good gameplay can come of trenches. Wehr are at least vulnerable to arty and snipers while they camp in heavy cover. Trenches provide complete or partial protection for both. They also leave you unable to move which makes for completely undynamic gameplay. Even in an extreme campy Wehr strat, units move around in battle, use nades etc. Trenches just sit your units in them and are basically invincible against most things and extremely vulnerable to a few things. There is no moving or abilites usage because you a) can't and b) don't need to.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Desert_Fox

  • Translator
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 785
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2011, 09:48:02 PM »
No good gameplay can come of trenches. Wehr are at least vulnerable to arty and snipers while they camp in heavy cover. Trenches provide complete or partial protection for both. They also leave you unable to move which makes for completely undynamic gameplay. Even in an extreme campy Wehr strat, units move around in battle, use nades etc. Trenches just sit your units in them and are basically invincible against most things and extremely vulnerable to a few things. There is no moving or abilites usage because you a) can't and b) don't need to.

That's exactly what I mean. :)

Offline Seeme

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1880
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #25 on: June 24, 2011, 01:40:41 PM »
I would think adding a Manpower cost would help reduce abuse with trenches. But I guess if you camp you get a lot of Resources.
The Russians think there sooo tough, wait till the Ostheer comes...

Coh Name: Seeme

pariah

  • Guest
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #26 on: June 24, 2011, 05:59:38 PM »
Um, no. Camping means you are cut off from most territories, meaning you get less resources. That combined with the ludicrous Brit prices, means you don't stand a chance against a competent player...

Offline Desert_Fox

  • Translator
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 785
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #27 on: June 24, 2011, 06:25:31 PM »
Why always revive this old thread?

No trenches for russians!

pariah

  • Guest
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #28 on: June 24, 2011, 06:27:58 PM »
No Trenches for Brits either, preferably. ;D

Offline Otto Halfhand

  • Donor
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
Re: Why were Russian trenches removed in 1.4?
« Reply #29 on: June 24, 2011, 09:25:35 PM »
I'm surprised there is so much talk of bad game play vis a vis Trenches. Once your Ingenery finish their basic building; (they really are weak in front line combat); have them build an outpost about a third of the way up the map on a high resource or strategic choke point; Trenches in support range of OP. Barbed wire, road blocks and mines, Med truck to retreat and reinforce conscripts as your Line infantry comes into play. Oh yeah I almost forgot the whole point of the exercise is to protect the Firebase you back it up with.  ;) "Queen of Battle", very Soviet. Nice place for a Strategic Reserve when there are trenches. Otherwise you need an MG nest or Strelky with DPs in the outpost.


OT Regarding NI
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2011»,
                                                                                      
Quote
Just move 'em up the tree (swap with the "Red  Tide") - problem solved - they just cannot be OP for 4/5 CP, call-in,  can they?
+3, I would change Red Tide to 3CP,NI to 1CP...                   
Quote
SVTs are just a skin (it's guards' mosins by stats), one PTRD  is pathetic - just remove it, but let the upgrade bring AT nades with  longer cool-down than that of guards'
  :-\ Seems to me Molotovs are good against Light vehicles. Immobilize 'em and Hit 'em with the PTRD.
孫 The
EF_v1.7.10
子 Art
Illegitimi non Carborundum -"Vinegar" Joe Stilwell
兵 of
Sun Tzu says: In warfare one compels and is not compelled by others
法 War