Quote from: MaxiKing6 on May 17, 2011, 06:58:56 PMQuote from: Moonwalker on May 17, 2011, 06:56:55 PMQuote from: HerrVoss on May 17, 2011, 06:29:44 PMMaybe the PaK 43/41 to replace the 88 in defensive to give a mobile alternative. Also a 5 man crew seems like it would fit.Mmmm...mobile 88 ?? OP... It could have to lock down before firing.. Only if it would lock down forever.
Quote from: Moonwalker on May 17, 2011, 06:56:55 PMQuote from: HerrVoss on May 17, 2011, 06:29:44 PMMaybe the PaK 43/41 to replace the 88 in defensive to give a mobile alternative. Also a 5 man crew seems like it would fit.Mmmm...mobile 88 ?? OP... It could have to lock down before firing..
Quote from: HerrVoss on May 17, 2011, 06:29:44 PMMaybe the PaK 43/41 to replace the 88 in defensive to give a mobile alternative. Also a 5 man crew seems like it would fit.Mmmm...mobile 88 ?? OP...
Maybe the PaK 43/41 to replace the 88 in defensive to give a mobile alternative. Also a 5 man crew seems like it would fit.
Tell that to Relic - "KT! KT!"
OSTHEER IS DONE WHEN IT'S DONE!
Don't let my PaK 43/41 question die without a devs answer.
What the hell is it with people who are like "Maus Maus! IS-3 IS-3! Some other barely World War II tank! Rabble Rabble!"The more people whine about Maus and other stupid tanks, the more and more I hate the diea of the IS-3. It's a cool tank, but this entire super mega tank obsession is getting annoying.