Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Standardising the "big daddies"  (Read 5469 times)

Offline Paladin88

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
  • Tell me, are you afraid to die?
    • View Profile
Standardising the "big daddies"
« on: April 21, 2011, 06:06:31 AM »
What would you think if I suggested we make all of those "big" tanks a one-off call in. The King tiger is a one off already and so is the Jagdpanther but what if the pershing and the ISU-152 were also made to be a one off as well.

Or perhaps some may argue the opposite. Would it perhaps be better to take off those very limitations on those tanks?

What do you think?
OIY! Get your filthy hands off the Maus!
http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=5672.0

Hee hee, I added colour to the avatar. Isn't it nice?

Offline RedGuard

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1014
  • Welcome to Axis Front mod
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2011, 07:18:59 AM »
Their call in limit or lack of is there for balance reasons. Some would like to see them changed But it wont be due to balance. I think its fine the way it is  :)
Soviet is OP

Offline Paladin88

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
  • Tell me, are you afraid to die?
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2011, 09:59:06 AM »
Thanks, I appreciate the quick reply...
OIY! Get your filthy hands off the Maus!
http://easternfront.org/forums/index.php?topic=5672.0

Hee hee, I added colour to the avatar. Isn't it nice?

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2011, 01:24:04 PM »
Yes, Pershings are easily ripped apart by Tigers, KTs, even groups of Panthers. Their gun is extremely powerful but if you compare it to the other "Big Daddies" it lacks survivability, thus why you can call in new ones upon losing it.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

pariah

  • Guest
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2011, 02:35:11 PM »
The Pershing lacks survivability because it's backed up by other abilities of the doctrine.

And no, i disagree with the first post, because as REDcommissar says, it's like that for balance. Plus you can't compare the heavy tanks to the super tanks. Not to mention that the Eastern Front devs aren't going to change the relic armies.

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2011, 02:57:20 PM »
Pershing actually beats a Tiger at long range quite soundly. Not to mention vet 3 pershings can take on KTs with field repairs. Awesome tanks, and fun to use because of their speed.

As to the topic, the limits are there for a reason. Heavy tanks are 1 at a time and super heavy are called in once only. This is fine.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Zerstörer

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1829
  • Listen up knuckleheads!
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2011, 07:40:00 PM »
Pershing actually beats a Tiger at long range quite soundly. Not to mention vet 3 pershings can take on KTs with field repairs. Awesome tanks, and fun to use because of their speed.

As to the topic, the limits are there for a reason. Heavy tanks are 1 at a time and super heavy are called in once only. This is fine.
once again +1

Also, we're not making vanila balance adjustments without a very particular well thought out idea from COH experts
R.I.P MrScruff - A genuine Good Guy and great artist
R.I.P Loran Korn - A very brave and talented guy
RAP NEWS http://thejuicemedia.com/?ref=nf

pariah

  • Guest
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2011, 07:53:06 PM »
And by "experts" you mean the people in charge of balancing the Brits, or people who actually know what they are talking about? ;)

Offline Blackbishop

  • Administrator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 12053
  • Community Manager, Programmer and Kicker
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #8 on: April 21, 2011, 08:08:42 PM »
And by "experts" you mean the people in charge of balancing the Brits, or people who actually know what they are talking about? ;)
People in charge of discussing CoH Beta changes. That's all XD.
Mors Indecepta

Might controls everything, and without strength you cannot protect anything. Let alone yourself...

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #9 on: April 21, 2011, 08:46:27 PM »
Pershing actually beats a Tiger at long range quite soundly. Not to mention vet 3 pershings can take on KTs with field repairs. Awesome tanks, and fun to use because of their speed.
Yep, just dont forget to upgun it. Shermans gun upgrade works on Pershing too. It more then doubles its penetration.

pariah

  • Guest
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #10 on: April 21, 2011, 08:48:46 PM »
Shermans gun upgrade works on Pershing too. It more then doubles its penetration.
...How long has it been like that? Man, i BADLY want to test this now!

Offline Zerstörer

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1829
  • Listen up knuckleheads!
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #11 on: April 21, 2011, 09:37:17 PM »
Well, not doubling but it does make it far more likely to penetrate tiger/panther. It's been like that since 2.601. It also makes it for some reason stupidly better vs infantry. I've seen an instance where it insta-gibed 5 pe grens and I couldn't believe it. my reaction was to check if there was a mine that was set off, but it wasn't. It was just the gun
R.I.P MrScruff - A genuine Good Guy and great artist
R.I.P Loran Korn - A very brave and talented guy
RAP NEWS http://thejuicemedia.com/?ref=nf

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #12 on: April 21, 2011, 09:57:41 PM »
Well, not doubling but it does make it far more likely to penetrate tiger/panther. It's been like that since 2.601. It also makes it for some reason stupidly better vs infantry. I've seen an instance where it insta-gibed 5 pe grens and I couldn't believe it. my reaction was to check if there was a mine that was set off, but it wasn't. It was just the gun
???
Just checked Corsix and its AoE is similar to Tigers before the upgrade and similar to a Sherman (~40% lower) after it.

pariah

  • Guest
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #13 on: April 21, 2011, 09:59:42 PM »
2.601? That's the patch required to unlock the Soviets, isn't it? That's cool, so i don't have access to it anyway. The new Pershing sounds really overpowered to me...

Offline Zerstörer

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1829
  • Listen up knuckleheads!
    • View Profile
Re: Standardising the "big daddies"
« Reply #14 on: April 21, 2011, 10:12:38 PM »
Well, not doubling but it does make it far more likely to penetrate tiger/panther. It's been like that since 2.601. It also makes it for some reason stupidly better vs infantry. I've seen an instance where it insta-gibed 5 pe grens and I couldn't believe it. my reaction was to check if there was a mine that was set off, but it wasn't. It was just the gun
???
Just checked Corsix and its AoE is similar to Tigers before the upgrade and similar to a Sherman (~40% lower) after it.

I know, which is why I couldn't believe my eyes....it definitely makes it better at killing infantry, I guarantee you
R.I.P MrScruff - A genuine Good Guy and great artist
R.I.P Loran Korn - A very brave and talented guy
RAP NEWS http://thejuicemedia.com/?ref=nf