Ostheer Update 6: Ostheer Army Troops

[pariah]

Thanks, but i think it was a little excessive to post all of it.

[RedGuard]

haha yeah I actually read it too. I translator did that? it wasnt that bad

[Goober]

Thanks, but i think it was a little excessive to post all of it.

Sorry about that. I probably  should have trimmed it down a bit. 

[GATHRAWN]

sorry but i couldn't take that site seriuosly. while it was chalk full of tech. data, it was oviously made by a pro russian person. they made the soviet tanks seem like gods and the germans like bums. while i can see the late war soviet tanks as better than the germans due to their uninterupted production, research, and resources. but correct me if i'm wrong but didn't the germans have a better kill to knokout ratio than the russians? dosen't that prove something, if not that the germans had better crews, tech, or weapons. sure they lost but they took alot of soviets with them to the gates of hell.

[Goober]

Yes you are right. Some of the Russian tank were superior but there average crews were not. One major reason was the lack of radios in their tanks, making communication between tanks hard. But this should probably be got after at the history forum.

[RedGuard]

correct me if i'm wrong but didn't the germans have a better kill to knokout ratio than the russians? dosen't that prove something,

One thing I like to remind people of; your kill to death ratio counts for nothing if you have been defeated.

[Goober]

Thats a matter of opinion....

[RedGuard]

opinion - philosophy, call it what you would. 

But the fact remains the same, the victor dictates history.

[Ghost]

correct me if i'm wrong but didn't the germans have a better kill to knokout ratio than the russians? dosen't that prove something,

don't forget that the germans were mostly fighting out of defensive positions, while the russians were attacking. 

[Zerstörer]

correct me if i'm wrong but didn't the germans have a better kill to knokout ratio than the russians? dosen't that prove something,

don't forget that the germans were mostly fighting out of defensive positions, while the russians were attacking.

41-43 it was the germans 43-45 the soviets....I'd say it was mostly the other way around

But, gents all this 'historical adventures' must come to an end as they are...once again....irrelevant to this topic

[Seeme]

The panther is widely considered to be one of the best in WW2. Early versions suffered  from mechanical problems, borne from lack of proper testing.

Panzerkampfwagon Ausf G was very reliable, having 2953 built, it was a great success compared to D and A.(D being the Bad Broken models.)

[pariah]

The panther is widely considered to be one of the best in WW2. Early versions suffered  from mechanical problems, borne from lack of proper testing.

Panzerkampfwagon Ausf G was very reliable, having 2953 built, it was a great success compared to D and A.(D being the Bad Broken models.)

...Which means what, exactly, to Company Of Heroes?

[Blackbishop]

The panther is widely considered to be one of the best in WW2. Early versions suffered  from mechanical problems, borne from lack of proper testing.

Panzerkampfwagon Ausf G was very reliable, having 2953 built, it was a great success compared to D and A.(D being the Bad Broken models.)

...Which means what, exactly, to Company Of Heroes?

That our panthers rocks . Seriously i think this topic has come to it's end. I'll close it now, but don't be sad, on a few days the next Sneaky peaky will be posted.