Ostheer Update 6: Ostheer Army Troops

[Zerstörer]

Problem is: U cant talk about eastern front without Panther and Tiger.
Both tanks were developed as answer for the russian T-34 so an Ostheer NEED this symbols.
There is no way around.

Hell yeah! 

It'd be true if EF only included Ostheer and Soviets....but includes WH and PE. As such its more about delivering a different faction than it is about the 'must have units'...well...that's my opinion anyways

[GSmirlis]

Problem is: U cant talk about eastern front without Panther and Tiger.
Both tanks were developed as answer for the russian T-34 so an Ostheer NEED this symbols.
There is no way around.

Hell yeah! 

It'd be true if EF only included Ostheer and Soviets....but includes WH and PE. As such its more about delivering a different faction than it is about the 'must have units'...well...that's my opinion anyways

-1 No man! EF is super wow because it includes them all!!!
Thats my opinion

[Blackbishop]

Problem is: U cant talk about eastern front without Panther and Tiger.
Both tanks were developed as answer for the russian T-34 so an Ostheer NEED this symbols.
There is no way around.

Hell yeah! 

It'd be true if EF only included Ostheer and Soviets....but includes WH and PE. As such its more about delivering a different faction than it is about the 'must have units'...well...that's my opinion anyways

Let's hope this works, otherwise will be changed in the beta .

@Wordsmith
About the Nashorn to replace OH's KT... Nah, there are other places where it could fit .

[pariah]

I would say that the Panther and Tiger are more suited to the Ostheer than Wehrmacht/Panzer Elite for the reasons Lord Rommel stated. So if only 1 army is going to have them, it should be the Ostheer. But since you aren't going to remove anything from the relic armies (nor should you), that ain't gonna happen.

So basically:

Both tanks were developed as answer for the russian T-34 so an Ostheer NEED this symbols.

Simple as that.

[edeka009]

I like Panther and Tiger too ! Tiger is a symbol, true!
I was thinking at Panther II to make some diference between Wehr/PE and Ostheer.
My problem is that i would like to play with Elephant but same time i'm looking for Sturer Emil...
I don't know..i'm like a stupid kid who can't choose between 2 toys..i wanna both of them:D!!!
I know that Elephant is a legend but i find it a little "ugly"..is a house on wheels...
but powerfull..has an 88mm and 20mm thick armour:> . Enough to destroy Su-85/Su-100 :-?
The Sturer Emil has beautiful proportions, more beautiful than Marder I ( I find Marder II ugly too),
and is more powerfull...128mm :X:X:X...

What i'm trying to say...replace Marder II with Elephant and put in doctrine the Sturer Emil > 2 pieces...
2 was in their history too...and if u lose them (u r a loser then)...another 2 u never receive...just 2 pls..
or find u devs something to add them somewhere:-??
These tanks deserve to be protected on the battlefield...not Marders II..

It sound like a pray to God =))


Excuse my bad english:(

[Blackbishop]

Nope. Elefant will be a doctrinal tank destroyer. About the Panther II... don't think that will be implemented. Perhaps could work as an option if the Tiger thingy doesn't works as supposed, but as this unit wasn't built in ww2...

[edeka009]

If you're not the who you love, then love the who you're with! OK..but dress him with a nice skin;)
Post Merge: April 18, 2011, 10:30:18 PMput in a "with" somewhere..i forgot it..

[Ghost]

I know that Elephant is a legend but i find it a little "ugly"..is a house on wheels...
but powerfull..has an 88mm and 20mm thick armour:> . Enough to destroy Su-85/Su-100 :-?
[...]
What i'm trying to say...replace Marder II with Elephant and put in doctrine the Sturer Emil > 2 pieces...[...]

you mean 200mm armor 
there is no point in adding elefant as a regular unit. it would destroy balance unless you make it weak enough which would not be very clever (200mm armor is quite a lot and an 88mm gun is good as well)...it is too strong for a regular unit -> like blackbishop said: doctrine unit

[cephalos]

Tiger II in OH doctrine sounds quite disturbing, but I think it's totally OK. Devs clearly said, that Fortress Army Troops are about getting encircled and rescured. KT seems to be perfect "rolling bunker" and breaking through enemy lines. I'm fine with it, because while playing Terror Doctrine I'll use Tiger Ace ( who is far more cool than KT).

[Desert_Fox]

Panther II was never builded, only its projects exist, and you must know that the prototype can't be implemented in EF.

[pariah]

while playing Terror Doctrine I'll use Tiger Ace ( who is far more cool than KT).

But... The Königstiger replaced the Tiger Ace. How can you use the Tiger Ace?

[cephalos]

Reward unit that devs promised us 

[edeka009]

Yes, u've right;)

[delmar77]

Tiger Ace return!!!
Elephant IS beatiful,,,, smashing all

Batle of KursK whitH Elephant, Tiger and Panther,, it is AXIOMATIC

[RedGuard]

I liked original tiger ace better than KT ne wayz.  Its still in the SP demo too I think

along with tons of other broken stuff