Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread  (Read 68022 times)

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #105 on: October 23, 2011, 05:47:47 AM »
The tank destroyers/self-propelled guns were a way to upgun outdated tank designs cheaply, to increase their effectiveness and change their role. Some examples are:

Panzer III - Stug III
Panzer IV - Stug IV
             - Jagdpanzer IV
Panzer 38(t) - Hetzer
                 - Marder III
Hotchkiss/Panzer II - Marder I (GWagon)/Marder II

Often, outdated tanks could have their turret replaced with a turretless superstructure that allowed for a much larger gun. This was a cheap way to make old tanks effective again. They weren't built new from factories (the Jagdpanther/Jagdtiger/Elefant are probably exceptions) but were rather taken back to factories to have turrets removed and superstructures/massive guns added.
« Last Edit: October 23, 2011, 05:51:08 AM by GodlikeDennis »
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Pauly3

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
  • I have studied your art.
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #106 on: October 23, 2011, 02:48:44 PM »
and some of those gapfillers proved to be very effective
Wittman, the most succesfull tank ace of WW2 started in a Stug III
actually i think the CoH Wehrmacht is weird cause Stug III was way more common than Stug IV :D
"But risk has always been an inescapable part of warfare."
Grand Admiral Thrawn

Offline Dann88

  • Soviet Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #107 on: October 23, 2011, 03:01:14 PM »
In a movie I saw, US soldiers threw stones to make mines explode, can it work in real life? Because most of mines I know (and in that movie) was buried.
I'm drunk now, I'm outranked you in philosophy.

Offline Walentin 'Walki' L.

  • Developer
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3262
  • Creator of Things
    • View Profile
    • Steam Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #108 on: October 23, 2011, 03:08:45 PM »
Yes, my brother is a pioneer in the Bundeswehr and he showed me a book with a lot of mines (all types). Anti infantry & Anti Tank: Almost every mine had the text: To defuse, trigger the mine from save distance by shooting or throwing something against it.

I.E. Butterfly mines they are defused by shooting at them.
I identify as a four-eyed bird man. /s

Offline Dann88

  • Soviet Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #109 on: October 26, 2011, 05:12:45 PM »
Why the German flamthrowers wear goggles? Because of the "flash" from flame or the heat? If the heat then they have to wear a mask (with goggles in it) :P
By the way, the goggles with mask used in Africa I saw in games and movies are kinda... scary (and cool :D), is the goggles come with other stuffs like cloth and backpack all the time or some soldiers got it, some didn't?
I just found out the iron canister the grenadiers carry behind have a gas mask in it, imagine a blob of gas-masked grenadiers :P
I'm drunk now, I'm outranked you in philosophy.

Offline Walentin 'Walki' L.

  • Developer
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3262
  • Creator of Things
    • View Profile
    • Steam Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #110 on: October 26, 2011, 05:57:12 PM »
Why the German flamthrowers wear goggles? [...]

Cause a flamethrower is very hot :p. Try to sit very close to a campfire and stare at it. I don't think you are able to face it for long and of course it was also as a protection.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2011, 06:10:55 PM by walki1 »
I identify as a four-eyed bird man. /s

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #111 on: October 26, 2011, 06:06:22 PM »
Why the German flamthrowers wear goggles? [...]

Cause a flamethrower is very hot :p. Try to sit very close to a campfire and stare at it. I don't think you are able to face it for long and of course also as a protection.
i belive we call that a "good point"


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Dann88

  • Soviet Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #112 on: October 26, 2011, 09:07:35 PM »
If it's hot then just a goggles will not enough, just wear mask with goggles then.
I'm drunk now, I'm outranked you in philosophy.

Offline Walentin 'Walki' L.

  • Developer
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3262
  • Creator of Things
    • View Profile
    • Steam Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #113 on: October 26, 2011, 09:23:08 PM »
Never had the effect that your eyes hurted after you sat next to a campfire but your face didn't hurt then :P.
I identify as a four-eyed bird man. /s

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #114 on: October 26, 2011, 09:34:25 PM »
i think also they wore masks because breathing burning gasoline fumes
isnt too good on the ol' lungs.


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #115 on: October 27, 2011, 01:17:33 AM »
Neither is gunpowder :P

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #116 on: October 27, 2011, 02:26:25 AM »
i think also they wore masks because breathing burning gasoline fumes
isnt too good on the ol' lungs.

Neither is most of the crap that soldiers were breathing. Breathing gas was the least of their worries.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Darkjolly

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • I will Decimate you, from afar
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #117 on: October 28, 2011, 04:38:37 AM »
After lurking some pages, Ive was surprised too see the Soviets and the Finish actually had their own battles. Were the Finns on the axis or allied side on? or were they just defending their land and then went neutral?
He who seeks peace, must be prepared for war
-- Claudius

When the Ostheer come out the only matches you will see online will be Soviet/Soviet vs Ostheer/Ostheer.

R.I.P Britain, America, PE, Wermacht

Offline Sommarkatze

  • Axis Commander
  • Commissar
  • *
  • Posts: 403
  • KCH should wear capes at vet 3 !
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #118 on: October 28, 2011, 01:50:13 PM »
Ever heard about the winter war? XD

They were on the axis side. Partly? XD Not allied really, more like - we are fighting the same enemy lets help each other out? <3

Fun fact is that the finnish fought for a little time against the germans!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lapland_War

My English is kind of useless. But that because Iam swedish Wooohoooj! ;3

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #119 on: October 28, 2011, 05:33:07 PM »
sommarkatze pretty much summed it up. soviets fought finns when the soviet union and germany were still allied, and the finns used guerilla warfare to wear down the red army.
they were defending their land.


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?