Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread  (Read 67991 times)

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #165 on: January 22, 2012, 03:45:23 PM »
-small size and not that heavy

idk man I held a thompson once and it was pretty damn heavy for an SMG. I would say its even heavier than an AK47

I also thought the thompson felt pretty awkward when I put it to my shoulder and aimed down the sights. But I held a Sten once and awkward doesnt even begin to describe it.

Whats wrong with the Sten ???

Though I've never shot it, the fact that the mag goes in from the left and it had a very similar body design to the MP28. It also had a large brace (grip? Not sure how to say) on the back to help "Stabilize" the gun.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #166 on: January 22, 2012, 03:47:12 PM »
I guess the Brits kept making it caue it was so cheap :P.

How come they didn't just copy the MP40? I mean the magazines are literally the same and the concept of stamped sheets of metal are the same too.

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #167 on: January 22, 2012, 03:52:54 PM »
I guess the Brits kept making it caue it was so cheap :P.

How come they didn't just copy the MP40? I mean the magazines are literally the same and the concept of stamped sheets of metal are the same too.

Before America joined the war Britain were lend-leasing and purchasing huge amounts of Thompson SMGs, and when the USA joined the allies the demand for Thompsons was extreme. Britain needed a "Carbon Copy" or at least their own SMG to supplement what the US could not give them. I suppose they took what they could find.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #168 on: January 22, 2012, 11:01:41 PM »
we should probably rename this thread to /K/


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #169 on: January 23, 2012, 05:34:57 AM »
Why /K/ ???. What does that stand for ???

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline DrRockzo1986

  • Donor
  • Guard
  • *
  • Posts: 153
  • You're pretty good
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #170 on: January 23, 2012, 12:23:47 PM »
yeah im not following that one either
An Ocelot never lets his prey escape


image hosting jpeg

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #171 on: January 23, 2012, 06:25:18 PM »
/k/ is 4chan's imageboard for discussing all types of weaponry, from tanks to guns and knives. but i was just joking.


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #172 on: January 23, 2012, 09:28:12 PM »
Well this was a discussion on WW2 guns and their uses and production supplies so I believe it fits the context :P. But I appreciate the joke :D

BTW I was watch a clip from the show "Band Of Brothers" and a Sherman one shotted a Jagdpanther (or SuG III,no sure) Could this really happen in RL ???

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #173 on: January 23, 2012, 09:44:19 PM »
i doubt it.


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #174 on: January 24, 2012, 07:11:57 AM »
But since it is a TV miniseries, Why not ;D
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!

Offline Sommarkatze

  • Axis Commander
  • Commissar
  • *
  • Posts: 403
  • KCH should wear capes at vet 3 !
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #175 on: January 24, 2012, 12:18:01 PM »
If I remeber that episode right ( Its both a stug and a jagdpanther I think?) The sherman could yes penentrate it. Because they are like.. 100 meters away from each other? And they are coming from the side of them. Not sure about the Jagdpanther though.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2012, 12:21:09 PM by Sommarkatze »

My English is kind of useless. But that because Iam swedish Wooohoooj! ;3

Offline Jeff 'Robotnik' W.

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
  • Forum historian
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #176 on: January 24, 2012, 03:22:06 PM »
a 75mm sherman was able to penetrate the stug IV at short range, while the 76mm could penetrate it at about normal range

75mm is incapable of penetrating the front armor of the jagdpanther at any range, but can penetrate the side armor easily at most ranges

here is a picture of a stug that was destroyed from the front by a 75mm sherman

caption: "Troops examine a knocked-out German StuG III assault gun near Cassino, 18 May 1944. Two 75mm AP rounds from a Sherman tank have neatly penetrated its front armour."
« Last Edit: January 24, 2012, 03:23:38 PM by robotnik »

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #177 on: January 24, 2012, 06:43:30 PM »
No in Band Of brothers a group of Shermans from 2nd armor came in to help the airborne troops. They had 75mm guns IIRC. They fired once and the StuG III exploded. Not aure about the Jagdpanther :-\

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline Jeff 'Robotnik' W.

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
  • Forum historian
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #178 on: January 24, 2012, 07:24:02 PM »
the round could have hit the ammunition, explosions are not as common as one thinks, usually it just sets a tank on fire

Offline conscript900

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 34
  • long live the motherland!
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #179 on: February 04, 2012, 08:14:03 AM »
an interesting thing about the german panther tank is that in combat sherman's would fire at it at point blank range and it would do nothing.{spelling and not always but more often than a tank commander would like.}
the future soviet union lies in Kane's hands!