Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread  (Read 57502 times)

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #150 on: January 19, 2012, 10:21:42 AM »
Long range Pwnage.
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!

Offline Mass Killer DL

  • Strelky
  • **
  • Posts: 69
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #151 on: January 19, 2012, 01:45:22 PM »
Yeah but the AK is by far the most reliable gun in the world it can get ran over by a tank and still work correctly, and because of its simple interior it can also be dropped in a barrel of water and still fire correctly.
They come for our blood but drown in their own!

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #152 on: January 19, 2012, 08:34:29 PM »
m3 grease gun doesnt have recoil bcuz it doesnt have firepower. those things were designed to be dismantled into parts, used by paratroops, and that stuff.


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #153 on: January 20, 2012, 01:52:18 AM »
I dont think it has high recoil b/c of its small bullet and its low rate of fire. Not necessarily it doesn't have stopping power. Getting hit with a bullet will stop you alright :P

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #154 on: January 20, 2012, 08:50:31 AM »
But your body will keep moving due to Inertia.
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #155 on: January 20, 2012, 12:10:48 PM »
But the force pushing the guy with the AK is higher than the guy with the M3(higher muzzle velocity I think). So that must be considered too

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #156 on: January 20, 2012, 01:44:29 PM »
I thought we were discussing stopping power.
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!

Offline Dann88

  • Soviet Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #157 on: January 20, 2012, 04:28:01 PM »
Just finished the dinner and I wonder what the soldiers in ww2 ate?
I'm drunk now, I'm outranked you in philosophy.

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Jeff 'Robotnik' W.

  • Developer
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
  • Forum historian
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #159 on: January 20, 2012, 07:22:18 PM »
the ak47 is an assault rifle, and the thompson is a submachine gun. its hard to compare the two because of how they each are meant to perform different tasks. some comparisons

thompson:
-better stopping power (has a larger bullet)
-higher rate of fire
-less recoil because of less powerful cartridge
-small size and not that heavy

ak47
-better penetration (larger cartridge)
-better range
-better accuracy

submachineguns are better when used in close combat like when assaulting a bunker or when in a house, while assault rifles are better as general purpose rifle. assault guns however have replaced most submachinegun use, but special forces and other special units still prefer their use because of light weight and use in close combat

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #160 on: January 21, 2012, 12:15:37 AM »
Just finished the dinner and I wonder what the soldiers in ww2 ate?

Soldiers in WW2 used to eated canned food. I know US soliders ate rations (Brits may have used rations too). They had special letter designations. I think regular infantry had C-rations (nicknamed c rats), air borne had K-rations and so forth. They kinda sucked but thats all they had :P. Unless you wanted to shoot and roast any anmals u found. They also had mess halls (if you were back at base) where they served regular food.

I think germans  had canned food too. But there were sometimes shortages and had to do other stuff (i remember reading a book where they ate the rats running around but the new soldiers didn't know. One kid barfed :P)

Not sure about Ruskies :P

Eventually the US army phased out rations cause they were havey and clunky and had a competion to fnd a new food unit. They decided to use the MRE (Meal Ready to Eat). It was lightweight b/c its in a tough baggy (made of a special material) and durable (can fall out of a plane with n problem). All you have to do is pur water in it and a special chemical inside heats up (extremely hot, like 200 F or 100C) so its good to eat. And I hear it taste good. They even have a vegitarian option.

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline bangalor44

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 31
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #161 on: January 21, 2012, 04:50:27 AM »
thats true fish.Their not bad.Pretty good acturally.The water thing is unreal it really works.I've had german mres also.decent meals.But hey can't beat a steak.

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #162 on: January 21, 2012, 05:22:47 AM »
LOL the most popular MRE is the pot roast, steak, and the egg noodle (cause thats the veggie option)

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline DrRockzo1986

  • Donor
  • Guard
  • *
  • Posts: 153
  • You're pretty good
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #163 on: January 22, 2012, 02:39:03 PM »
-small size and not that heavy

idk man I held a thompson once and it was pretty damn heavy for an SMG. I would say its even heavier than an AK47

I also thought the thompson felt pretty awkward when I put it to my shoulder and aimed down the sights. But I held a Sten once and awkward doesnt even begin to describe it.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2012, 02:45:35 PM by DrRockzo1986 »
An Ocelot never lets his prey escape


image hosting jpeg

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: WW2 Warfare Discussion thread
« Reply #164 on: January 22, 2012, 03:36:40 PM »
-small size and not that heavy

idk man I held a thompson once and it was pretty damn heavy for an SMG. I would say its even heavier than an AK47

I also thought the thompson felt pretty awkward when I put it to my shoulder and aimed down the sights. But I held a Sten once and awkward doesnt even begin to describe it.

Whats wrong with the Sten ???

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"