Eastern Front 1.30 Patch

[FritzFrisbee]

just downloaded 1.3, but i cant find 2p Duclair?

[Desert_Fox]

In download (41%) 

[Redbull]

Me neither, can't find Duclair (2), nor "Egletons" (2) nor "Dom Pavlova" (4) nor Psel either. otherwise...
THANK YOU !

[Strayker]

Overall a good patch. Though ive noticed that when you play as soviets and youll upgrade to T-34/85 you can still build both T-34/76 and T-34/85, which is strange. In addition to that, when you choose Breaktrough strategy you can call both the 700mp Tank raiders with T-34/76 and the 800mp Tank raiders with T-34/85. Is it a bug or is it intended?

[Desert_Fox]

In addition to that, when you choose Breaktrough strategy you can call both the 700mp Tank raiders with T-34/76 and the 800mp Tank raiders with T-34/85. Is it a bug or is it intended?

Is something desired , but about the production I don't know.

[SuperGérard]

Hi guys thank for this incommensurable patch, silly question but I can't find Egletons (2) map.

[Killar]

Overall a good patch. Though ive noticed that when you play as soviets and youll upgrade to T-34/85 you can still build both T-34/76 and T-34/85, which is strange. In addition to that, when you choose Breaktrough strategy you can call both the 700mp Tank raiders with T-34/76 and the 800mp Tank raiders with T-34/85. Is it a bug or is it intended?

it´s not a bug.

Another strange thing is that tank hunters cant recrew heavy weapons.
KV2 can now be build in middle game, but i thought it´s a late game unit.
But overall a good patch! Dankov with MG42 

[Strayker]

Overall a good patch. Though ive noticed that when you play as soviets and youll upgrade to T-34/85 you can still build both T-34/76 and T-34/85, which is strange. In addition to that, when you choose Breaktrough strategy you can call both the 700mp Tank raiders with T-34/76 and the 800mp Tank raiders with T-34/85. Is it a bug or is it intended?

it´s not a bug.

Well if its not a bug, then honestly i think it was better in pre-1.30. It doesnt make sense, why would one want to call /76 when he can call the /85 version of T-34. Its same as when you play as US and research the 76mm upgrade for M4s and youll still be able to build the outdated and outpowered 75mm...IMO very strange.

[Rikard Blixt]

Having both, allows us to increase price AND power of the /85, else we need to keep the price more or less the same.

[revoluzer]

Well, that I can buy both Versions is a deal.
You can buy what you need and can afford at the moment.
And it also differs from the Sherman-upgrade...

[Desert_Fox]

Wooooo! SAS rulez! 

I've just tried only RMC, Soviets not yet.
Like others, I can't see some maps.

Anyway, good patch and good work.

PS Marines Sappers aren't able to repairs SAS Jeeps?

[Strayker]

Well, that I can buy both Versions is a deal.
You can buy what you need and can afford at the moment.
And it also differs from the Sherman-upgrade...

Nope it doesnt...its essentialy the same upgrade. You trade infantry firepower for better armor firepower. Its the same case for the 75mm to 76mm and /76 to /85.

@Rizz thanks for explanation.
Post Merge: January 22, 2011, 12:25:52 PM

PS Marines Sappers aren't able to repairs SAS Jeeps?

They are able to repair jeeps, but when you lost one of them, you can repair the other one only to 50% health.

[revoluzer]

@Strayker
You missinterpreted my comment

I meant, that it differs in the it is conducted.
After the upgrade you can only buy the 76mm sherman, but you can buy both t34...

Why do the sappes where whool hat and no helmet, a helmet would suit much more to them... 

[Rikard Blixt]

PS Marines Sappers aren't able to repairs SAS Jeeps?

They are able to repair jeeps, but when you lost one of them, you can repair the other one only to 50% health.
[/quote]
No, you can repair it to full, which is 50% of squad health.

[Strayker]

PS Marines Sappers aren't able to repairs SAS Jeeps?

They are able to repair jeeps, but when you lost one of them, you can repair the other one only to 50% health.

No, you can repair it to full, which is 50% of squad health.
[/quote]
Well thats basically what i meant...