Large list of proposed changes! (PLEASE READ) and add input. (v 3.1.0.0)

[Raider217]

I think that the call in t-74 could give all infantry the ride tank ability, after the upgrades armour type has been changed to Sherman.

This was brought up before and put down because of fears of snipers etc etc going aboard and base rushing ntm Tank guards are very good and suit the purpose of assisting the T-34 just fine.

[cephalos]

it would be really strange to see 8-man conscript squad riding t-34...

[IJoe]

This was brought up before and put down because of fears of snipers etc etc going aboard and base rushing ntm Tank guards are very good and suit the purpose of assisting the T-34 just fine.

This is nonsense, for I've seen amateur mods where that issue was realized, with no snipers allowed on a tank, limitation to 4\6 men per tank and high vulnerability of those, sitting on the armour. So there's really no reason not to implement it, except for one's simple dislike, or lack of desire to do so. At least I can't think of any other reason.

[GodlikeDennis]

If you're limited to 4 man squads or less, and they're still vulnerable while riding it, what's the point in having it at all?

[IJoe]

If you're limited to 4 man squads or less, and they're still vulnerable while riding it, what's the point in having it at all?

You could still transport engineers, for example. Anyway, I prefer 6 men limitation. Besides you can transport more than 1 squad, if they fit the limit. Since the recrewing bug is fixed, I suppose, soviet squads might become smaller as well.

[Blackbishop]

@Raydeen
Please post something constructive, not just to flame.

[Raydeen]

@Raydeen
Please post something constructive, not just to flame.

What did I do now?  Is writing, "drop the issue", I don't like it", "I don't want it", "end of argument", "Can't be done" somehow constructive?

[IJoe]

@Raydeen
Please post something constructive, not just to flame.

What did I do now?  Is writing, "drop the issue", I don't like it", "I don't want it", "end of argument", "Can't be done" somehow constructive?

Damn, dude, how many times do you need to be told that?
USE THE F...NG PM