I picked the French one, France seems to have lost every war they were involved in, so their equipment gotta suck too.
But it has a nice thing: soldiers who are going to surrender can easily definitly broke the gun, making it useless for the ennemy
Quote from: Red_Stinger on November 29, 2010, 06:13:43 PM But it has a nice thing: soldiers who are going to surrender can easily definitly broke the gun, making it useless for the ennemy Was that feature actually a part of design? I mean, it's rather strange to actually plan such things as surrender.
No wander, that mr Coluche said that about the rooster. Just kidding.
Bolt action rifles weren't to much important on the battlefield. In good armies the normal soldier is only needed as support and ammunition carrier for the machine gun. So in combat you have to only to prevent flanking and to provide ammunition to the machine guns which fire from the flanks.
Quote from: maxi1991 on December 02, 2010, 02:23:45 AMBolt action rifles weren't to much important on the battlefield. In good armies the normal soldier is only needed as support and ammunition carrier for the machine gun. So in combat you have to only to prevent flanking and to provide ammunition to the machine guns which fire from the flanks.One word, sniper...
I don't know the French MAS-36, but I'm sure that our Carcano '91 was one of the worst. Unreliable and often it gets stuck