Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Battle of Britain  (Read 7979 times)

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #15 on: October 06, 2010, 03:16:21 PM »
To put it in a nutshell, German High Command got all twisted up and impatient and decided to divert resources from attacking enemy airfields to the British war industry.
Some bombs feel on UK civilians first. Churchill asked RAF to bomb Germany in return. Hitler got mad that UK is bombing German cities and ordered to bomb London.

Czech Republic in march 1939 and Netherlands in may 1940 surrendered becouse Hitler threaten to bomb their capital city.

Offline Seeme

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1880
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #16 on: October 06, 2010, 11:35:31 PM »
And Neterlands?
The Russians think there sooo tough, wait till the Ostheer comes...

Coh Name: Seeme

Offline Sturmovik

  • Strelky
  • **
  • Posts: 99
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #17 on: October 08, 2010, 05:19:49 PM »
Why War has to come to the GB?
Why BoB have have the place in hystory?

In 1937-38 British consular send the unnoficial note to the European allies:
"When the war against russia is begin, there can be no war or other help to the russian front."

In 1937-38, Hitler have the official vote in Nazi meeting.
"Allies stupid, if hoping that the war is no way for their countries. I will attack the whole eastern countries, than, all nazi war machine will crush the west."

After "Versal Peace" that the whole political life of German is consentrating in allied hands, weakening of the military control & boundaries ... all that points have the expecting final for the Reichstag.
Soon Chehoslovakia & allied - nazi pact have the place. Pact tall that the western borders of the german is will be safe, in case of german - allied war have no happend. Soon Chehoslovakia is under Nazi control with no ather word of allied politic personal.

29 of may 1939 year. Roosvelt send messege to the massons in France(To the Bullit):
"all actions must be build of that cind, that the war with German must be no evead in europe. USA bring all war machine power to the europe democratic help."

P.S.: At the end of the war, allied countries interest with simple shoot the war criminals, with out the court-marshall. Soviet jurists, build the charges. Base of the churge is statistics, collect in republics, some europe countries, Poland, that makes the contract of that kind with SU in 1940 year. (USSR makes a two sided contracts with Poland, Bolgaria, Ukraina, Romania ect.)
Long length negotiations with USA & GB make it ... court marshall will be justified. BUT, defendants takes to disfranchise.
Poland, France, and then GB is to fall a victim of unadeqate politics & so needed to world, with great, great unfortunately conditions to simple civilian europe population.

FINAL POINT:
Spain civilian war, Battle of Britain, Russian-Finland war(with nazi callback), Battle fo France, takes first blood of unsuspicious people.
« Last Edit: October 08, 2010, 07:56:03 PM by Sturmovik »
"- .... мне он тут мёртвый нужен а не пленный, бей его, пока он руки не успел поднять!!!"

Offline SK8ERatWAR

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
  • two million soldiers can't be wrong
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2010, 04:51:23 PM »
Why War has to come to the GB?
Why BoB have have the place in hystory?

In 1937-38 British consular send the unnoficial note to the European allies:
"When the war against russia is begin, there can be no war or other help to the russian front."

In 1937-38, Hitler have the official vote in Nazi meeting.
"Allies stupid, if hoping that the war is no way for their countries. I will attack the whole eastern countries, than, all nazi war machine will crush the west."

After "Versal Peace" that the whole political life of German is consentrating in allied hands, weakening of the military control & boundaries ... all that points have the expecting final for the Reichstag.
Soon Chehoslovakia & allied - nazi pact have the place. Pact tall that the western borders of the german is will be safe, in case of german - allied war have no happend. Soon Chehoslovakia is under Nazi control with no ather word of allied politic personal.

29 of may 1939 year. Roosvelt send messege to the massons in France(To the Bullit):
"all actions must be build of that cind, that the war with German must be no evead in europe. USA bring all war machine power to the europe democratic help."

P.S.: At the end of the war, allied countries interest with simple shoot the war criminals, with out the court-marshall. Soviet jurists, build the charges. Base of the churge is statistics, collect in republics, some europe countries, Poland, that makes the contract of that kind with SU in 1940 year. (USSR makes a two sided contracts with Poland, Bolgaria, Ukraina, Romania ect.)
Long length negotiations with USA & GB make it ... court marshall will be justified. BUT, defendants takes to disfranchise.
Poland, France, and then GB is to fall a victim of unadeqate politics & so needed to world, with great, great unfortunately conditions to simple civilian europe population.

FINAL POINT:
Spain civilian war, Battle of Britain, Russian-Finland war(with nazi callback), Battle fo France, takes first blood of unsuspicious people.

what the hell does this have to do with battle of britain..
the only thing you worry about is your precious mother russia, and that everybody hears about how great it is..
damn, and you're really brainwashed, try to see things from our side and not only from stalin's side.. he might be wrong you know..

Offline Seeme

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1880
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2010, 05:25:24 PM »
Some say, If you hear the Soviet National Anthem on U-Tube 5 times in a row, you get brainwashed. How much times has this person heard it, 20?
The Russians think there sooo tough, wait till the Ostheer comes...

Coh Name: Seeme

Offline cephalos

  • Mapper
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1367
  • Pick a card...
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2010, 05:36:32 PM »
Some say, If you hear the Soviet National Anthem on U-Tube 5 times in a row, you get brainwashed. How much times has this person heard it, 20?

I believe that he is full to the throat with nutricious red commie blood  :-X

Offline Newbie.

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
  • A single Tiger was worth ten Sherman. I'm the 11th
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2010, 09:48:43 PM »
Some say, If you hear the Soviet National Anthem on U-Tube 5 times in a row, you get brainwashed. How much times has this person heard it, 20?

I've heard it 6. :D

I must say, i personally think the Battle of Britain Should've been called the "Battle Over Britain" as it was Fought by theCommonwealth, such as the ANAFC, the Polish, French and South Africans ;)

Offline bigjo

  • Donor
  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #22 on: January 31, 2011, 04:29:40 PM »
Battles are usually named after where they took place, so 'Battle of Britain' is entirely appropriate.

But after reading this book, it seems that there are lots of myths that surround the battle:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Invasion-1940-Derek-Robinson/dp/1845294416 [nofollow]

In a nutshell, even if the RAF had taken an even worse hammering, the Royal Navy and the British Army could have defeated the invasion on their own.

Some perspective. In British waters (not counting vessels on convoy duty or around the world) the RN had 80 Destroyers. The entire German Navy only had 8. The Germans also were forced to use small numbers of totally unsuitable boats for their planned invasion. If they had tried it in 1940 the channel would have been clogged with dead Wermacht soldiers and sinking invasion barges.

Offline IJoe

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1025
  • Who controls the present controls the past.
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #23 on: January 31, 2011, 06:35:59 PM »
what the hell does this have to do with battle of britain..
the only thing you worry about is your precious mother russia, and that everybody hears about how great it is..
damn, and you're really brainwashed, try to see things from our side and not only from stalin's side.. he might be wrong you know..
WTF???
Everyone cares mostly for his "mother-[insert required country name]", and there's nothing wrong with it.
He seemed to be talking about hypocrisy and overall evilness of "western" leaders of the time. - I couldn't agree more. And that's not because soviet leaders were any better, but merely due to the fact, that somehow you, people never really "try to see things from our side and not only from [some shitty Churchill - he was full of shit IMO] side" 'cause "Stalin" might be not the only man to definitely be wrong.
But the hypocrisy always wins: today we hear lots of hails to the US, which was the only country to use atomic weapon, and on the top of that, it was used upon absolutely innocent civilian population, while it is widely accepted, that such an atrocity was absolutely unnecessary - the might of the weapon could simply be shown to the japanese at the testing ground. BTW, it was the only "democratic" country (not authoritarian) to actually have legal segregation up until 1970s!

EDIT: Sorry for the off-topic, this was just too much for me to let go.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 06:39:09 PM by IJoe »

If you want a picture of the future,
imagine a boot stamping on a human face
— forever.

Offline cephalos

  • Mapper
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1367
  • Pick a card...
    • View Profile
Re: Battle of Britain
« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2011, 06:53:06 PM »
looks like this topic has risen from a grave...