KV1 should replace lend-lease sherman, as a reward unit As it is a churchill-wannabe
Quote from: Loupblanc on August 11, 2010, 04:32:09 AM KV1 should replace lend-lease sherman, as a reward unit As it is a churchill-wannabe +1If that happened I would definately use it over the Sherman
I think the KV had a pretty good gun (compared to the Churchill) so i would give away some defense for a better gun (one that can at least do effective damage to infantry).If we made a reward version of a Churchill (as the KV 1 seems to be described) wouldn't it be more or less a Churchill with a different design. That would be kinda pointless wouldn't it?
Quote from: Raider217 on August 11, 2010, 09:34:10 AMQuote from: Loupblanc on August 11, 2010, 04:32:09 AM KV1 should replace lend-lease sherman, as a reward unit As it is a churchill-wannabe +1If that happened I would definately use it over the Sherman+2 Nice idea! It could have better armor but a crappy gun same as Churchills. That would make an excellent reward unit of it.
Quote from: Strayker on August 11, 2010, 05:37:32 PMQuote from: Raider217 on August 11, 2010, 09:34:10 AMQuote from: Loupblanc on August 11, 2010, 04:32:09 AM KV1 should replace lend-lease sherman, as a reward unit As it is a churchill-wannabe +1If that happened I would definately use it over the Sherman+2 Nice idea! It could have better armor but a crappy gun same as Churchills. That would make an excellent reward unit of it. +3 make it so, then
Quote from: Philmark on August 09, 2010, 04:13:38 PMNice, soviets can finally pick up axis weapons!Only Panzershreck or Light MG42.Soviet can't take AT gun, Heavy MG42 or other
Nice, soviets can finally pick up axis weapons!
Quote from: Moonwalker on August 09, 2010, 05:39:54 PMQuote from: Philmark on August 09, 2010, 04:13:38 PMNice, soviets can finally pick up axis weapons!Only Panzershreck or Light MG42.Soviet can't take AT gun, Heavy MG42 or other So is the lack of ability to retake a soviet AT or a soviet MG bunker after its crew has been killed is isn't a bug?
[CoH:EF-Dev]Walki: BULLSHIT[CoH:EF-Dev]Walki: I'll eat a tree if this won't work now[CoH:EF-Dev]Rizz: ok[CoH:EF-Dev]Rizz: I'll hold you to it<10 minutes later>[CoH:EF-Dev]Walki: I think I really gotta eat a tree...[CoH:EF-Dev]Walki: got a decent one?
QuoteI think the KV had a pretty good gun (compared to the Churchill) so i would give away some defense for a better gun (one that can at least do effective damage to infantry).If we made a reward version of a Churchill (as the KV 1 seems to be described) wouldn't it be more or less a Churchill with a different design. That would be kinda pointless wouldn't it?Well Churchills had many guns, but most commonly the 6pdr gun was used which is 57mm. So yeah youre right KV-1 had a bigger gun - 76mm. So then it could be something like better armored and much slower version of a T-34/76...because it used the same gun.