Quote from: Werwolf on August 22, 2010, 03:37:52 PMQuote from: loatty on August 22, 2010, 10:01:21 AMhe's right for about 50%, if a gun is produced in large numbers, it is the best gun a country uses at that moment.However, the US tried to make a copy of the MG42 themselves, which failed due to a failed design.Because they tried combining key components from what they thought were the best available German weapons. The mashed-up design which eventually became the M60 was an EPIC FAIL on their part. At least the Soviets got it right with the StG44 >> AK47... the Americans were still using technically the same WW2 firearms in Korea and Vietnam (early Vietnam war). Ironically, the antique MG42s and DshKs used by the NVA and VC outperformed the Americans' M60s, M1919s and Stoner 63 LMGs in the field.Didn't the M60 actually become rather (or at least somewhat) reliable when they made the E3 version right before it was replaced by the M240?
Quote from: loatty on August 22, 2010, 10:01:21 AMhe's right for about 50%, if a gun is produced in large numbers, it is the best gun a country uses at that moment.However, the US tried to make a copy of the MG42 themselves, which failed due to a failed design.Because they tried combining key components from what they thought were the best available German weapons. The mashed-up design which eventually became the M60 was an EPIC FAIL on their part. At least the Soviets got it right with the StG44 >> AK47... the Americans were still using technically the same WW2 firearms in Korea and Vietnam (early Vietnam war). Ironically, the antique MG42s and DshKs used by the NVA and VC outperformed the Americans' M60s, M1919s and Stoner 63 LMGs in the field.
he's right for about 50%, if a gun is produced in large numbers, it is the best gun a country uses at that moment.However, the US tried to make a copy of the MG42 themselves, which failed due to a failed design.