Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War  (Read 10769 times)

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #15 on: June 27, 2010, 11:23:03 PM »
Thompson.
1st is the best.
It wasnt a 1st smg but it was a first good and reliable smg.

2nd is Suomi. A very early and good design. It should be on the list. In a 9 man Finnish squad the bravest had Suomi.

3rd is STEN. It was so easy to build that the Polish move of resistance made them in bicycle shops! 9mm Parabellum ammo is a advantage too becouse you could use British, German and Italian ammo. Even PPSH cant beat that.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2010, 11:31:05 PM by Paciat »

Offline UeArtemis

  • Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
  • aka Cossack
    • View Profile
    • Company of Heroes: Eastern Front (mod)
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2010, 12:27:38 AM »
As I read, army used the box magazine for ППШ-41, the same way as for Thompson. Although there are more disk magazines on photographs. That's probably for the style, just like capes (cloaks).
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin

Offline EasyWay91

  • Strelky
  • **
  • Posts: 60
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #17 on: June 28, 2010, 01:17:04 AM »
Should I add the Suomi. I actually knew about it. I thought the PPSh-41 is basically just a continuation of it. The Suomi was more accurate and reliable than the PPSh-41, but is was very time consuming to produce as only around 70-80 thousand were built. Hmmm if you guys want it included, tell me.
Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?
-Joseph Stalin

Offline thebomb

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #18 on: June 28, 2010, 01:21:26 AM »
As I read, army used the box magazine for ППШ-41, the same way as for Thompson. Although there are more disk magazines on photographs. That's probably for the style, just like capes (cloaks).

That's a good point Artemis. In fact, I recently read about this: Soviet war time photographers preferred to take pictures of Soviet soldiers with the drum magazine instead of the box magazine because that's how ordinary folk recognized the weapon.

Offline Red_Stinger

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #19 on: June 28, 2010, 10:16:04 AM »
Should I add the Suomi. I actually knew about it. I thought the PPSh-41 is basically just a continuation of it. The Suomi was more accurate and reliable than the PPSh-41, but is was very time consuming to produce as only around 70-80 thousand were built. Hmmm if you guys want it included, tell me.

+1 you should include it!
"Du sublime au ridicule, il n'y a qu'un pas"
-Napoléon Bonaparte

Offline UeArtemis

  • Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
  • aka Cossack
    • View Profile
    • Company of Heroes: Eastern Front (mod)
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #20 on: June 28, 2010, 08:52:15 PM »
Suomi M/31
Weight: 4.6 kg
Cartridge: 9x19mm Parabellum
Rate of fire: 750–900 rounds/min
Muzzle velocity: 396 m/s
Maximum range: ~500 m
Feed system: 20, 36, 40, 50 box or 71-round drum. Also modified German MP 38 u. 40 32 round box magazine

Well, good.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2010, 08:57:11 PM by UeArtemis »
I believe in one thing only, the power of the human will. © Joseph Stalin

Offline Seeme

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1880
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #21 on: June 29, 2010, 02:10:38 AM »
I only picked Pshh Because thats the only ww2 weapon I Held and Fired.

I expected more recoil, I was impressed. Hard to aim though,
The Russians think there sooo tough, wait till the Ostheer comes...

Coh Name: Seeme

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #22 on: June 29, 2010, 01:51:29 PM »
Should I add the Suomi. I actually knew about it. I thought the PPSh-41 is basically just a continuation of it. The Suomi was more accurate and reliable than the PPSh-41, but is was very time consuming to produce as only around 70-80 thousand were built. Hmmm if you guys want it included, tell me.
Were talking about a small Finnish army. Suomi werent produced for export much becouse every country had pride tomake itsown smg.

Offline Akalonor

  • Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 776
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #23 on: June 29, 2010, 06:11:36 PM »
for me
1st MP40 , the only flaw was its hard to fire prone,
2nd Sten , because its similiar to the Mp40 but solves the prone firing problem
Molly: " It's our rock garden"
Dwight: "What are you farming, Bullcrap?"

You Are a Rebel Spy and a traitor to the Empire!
~Darth Vader

Any typos found may be given to Seeme.

Offline InRussiaCarDriveYou

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #24 on: June 29, 2010, 10:04:20 PM »
ppsh41

less recoil then Mp40, higher rate of fire, easy to fire prone, and more accurate at ranges.

Offline Akalonor

  • Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 776
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #25 on: June 30, 2010, 03:45:31 AM »
hmm can some one confirm that the PPsh41 was more accurate than the MP40 ?
Molly: " It's our rock garden"
Dwight: "What are you farming, Bullcrap?"

You Are a Rebel Spy and a traitor to the Empire!
~Darth Vader

Any typos found may be given to Seeme.

Offline thebomb

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #26 on: June 30, 2010, 04:12:17 AM »
hmm can some one confirm that the PPsh41 was more accurate than the MP40 ?

Not looking at anecdotal evidence we can see that the PPSh has a longer barrel (269 mm vs. 251 mm) than the MP40 and also has less recoil. Given this, it makes it more accurate.

Offline Red_Stinger

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #27 on: June 30, 2010, 02:32:59 PM »
I've heard that, in close-combat, MP40 was much more efficient because of its handiness and reliability, than PPSH41.

Also, the PPS42 should be added, it was a good SMG too!
"Du sublime au ridicule, il n'y a qu'un pas"
-Napoléon Bonaparte

Offline Werwolf

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 224
  • "Vorwärts, Sturmsoldaten! Für Das Vaterland!"
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #28 on: June 30, 2010, 03:25:25 PM »
Also, the PPS42 should be added, it was a good SMG too!
Yes, I agree. The PPS-42/43 was a reliable and tough personal-defense weapon (PDW). I still have some of my great-grandfather's old possessions (good thing he managed to hide away a lot of them before he was captured!), including the PPS-43 that he brought back from Narwa and used until Berlin '45...I was told that he accidentally dropped it in mud and deep puddles a lot of times, but it still fired. That's how tough it is.  ;) It remains in serviceable condition up until this very day, since my family regards it as a valuable heirloom.  :)

Wunderwaffen Doctrine: What technology created for us, we drive it towards the enemy.

Offline HyperSniper999

  • Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
  • Wehrmacht and Afrika Korps power!
    • View Profile
Re: Best Submachinegun of the Second World War
« Reply #29 on: July 03, 2010, 03:32:12 AM »
The Italian Mochetto M-38.

There weren't many made until after Italy fell, but many Americans and Germans used it from picking it off of dead Italians. And the fact the gun looks neat to me.
I've always liked it since I've played Medal of Honor Allied Assault's Breakthrough expansion. Probalbly were never see a game based on tha front again.
"You can close your eyes and plug your ears and be afraid and ignorant of the darker parts of history, but always know that you're the one responsible for allowing those events to happen again and with even greater consequences and not know how to end the nightmare you did upon yourself."