I dont like the Nashorn concept (long range tank killer) becouse Marders and Gwagons allready do massive dmg (150 and 250) at long ranges (60).There shouldnt be a vechicle that 2 shot kills a firefly or takes out a 17lbs emplacement without being in range of this gun.Quote from: GamblerSK on June 16, 2010, 10:18:13 PMbut against infantry is less usable also it can cost a bit more just to prevent spaming
but against infantry is less usable also it can cost a bit more just to prevent spaming
The panther is heavy tank, not medium.
The Panzer III Ausf. N was part of the first deployment of the "schwere Heeres-Panzerabteilung" - the Tiger-groups.In 1942 a Tiger-Abteilung had 20 Tiger I and 16 Panzer III.2 Tiger I and 2 Pz III formed a "Zug". 4 "Züge" formed 2 companies.4 Tigers were reserved for the commanding staff [ Stabswagen ].Mid 1943 Tiger-Abteilungen send their Panzer III back at home because from now Henschel could build enough Tigers to supply Tiger-Abteilungen with the full strength of 45 Tiger tanks.So all in all for a period of time Panzer III was a medium support tank for the Tigers. Panzer III should profect Tiger I against Infantry and other soft targets. The Panzer III Ausf. N got "hollow charge grenades" to be able to destroy heavy russian tanks.
QuoteI dont like the Nashorn concept (long range tank killer) becouse Marders and Gwagons allready do massive dmg (150 and 250) at long ranges (60).There shouldnt be a vechicle that 2 shot kills a firefly or takes out a 17lbs emplacement without being in range of this gun.Quote from: GamblerSK on June 16, 2010, 10:18:13 PMbut against infantry is less usable also it can cost a bit more just to prevent spamingIts hard to be less usable vs infantry than a MarderIII.Anyway, if there will be a Nashorn it shouldnt have more range, nor do more dmg than a Gwagon.The only thing it can be better at is armor type (Hummel),little More HP (400-450) and armor penetration.
Quote from: Lord Rommel on June 16, 2010, 11:28:07 PMThe Panzer III Ausf. N was part of the first deployment of the "schwere Heeres-Panzerabteilung" - the Tiger-groups.In 1942 a Tiger-Abteilung had 20 Tiger I and 16 Panzer III.2 Tiger I and 2 Pz III formed a "Zug". 4 "Züge" formed 2 companies.4 Tigers were reserved for the commanding staff [ Stabswagen ].Mid 1943 Tiger-Abteilungen send their Panzer III back at home because from now Henschel could build enough Tigers to supply Tiger-Abteilungen with the full strength of 45 Tiger tanks.So all in all for a period of time Panzer III was a medium support tank for the Tigers. Panzer III should profect Tiger I against Infantry and other soft targets. The Panzer III Ausf. N got "hollow charge grenades" to be able to destroy heavy russian tanks.Woow that does sound really nice. That would fit in very well in the game. oOhaving 2 tigers on the field and Pz. 3's (with the abilites to explained) would be kinda out standing And who the hell wants Pz4 vs T-34and Panther Vs IS-2? Do you want another Wehrmacht?hell, no.
To be quite honest, I think the Ostheer, conceived as a German-centric faction, should be scrapped. I mean, what was the rationale behind making the Ostheer? That because you had the Soviets, you had to have the Germans?We already had the Germans. PE and Wehrmacht. They are good enough at representing all aspects of the German armies, and... do we REALLY need a THIRD German faction? The way I see it, Ostheer should either be scrapped, or be reengineered into a new faction that relied completely on foreign troops. Take basic German units like Stugs, PIVs and Grenadiers, and then slap in the allies the Germans had on the Eastern Front as the medium-high tier units with the ocassional super-awesome units like Finnish snipers, Spanish veterans and Tiger combat groups.
Take that back. Its just dishonorable.
I dont want tanks that are in the game allready.