Unit - Reward suggestions thread:

[Gerrit 'Lord Rommel' G.]

Jupp. Good point at the red army reward thread xDDD

[BffWithDEATH]

How about adding the KV-122 as a reward unit for the IS-2 being cheaper to produce so you could have either the IS-2 or KV-122
Is-2 being more expensive but having slightly more armour, life, slower and being slightly more expensive
or
KV-122 being cheaper but slightly less armour, life and being faster

[Hendrik 'DarcReaver' S.]

This already is the case with IS-2 compared to T34. One is cheaper and less durable and the other is stronger overall but more expensive.

[Gerrit 'Lord Rommel' G.]

You guys are playing too much World of Tanks 
Your KV-122 was a single prototype tank to test the new 122mm gun of the IS-tanks.
It was never planed to use this prototype in field because the IS tanks are nothing else than a new version of the KV-concept.
So out of my view no chance.
AND in ingame terms u can already use the concept Darci described. And keep in mind; with Su-100 or T-34/85 u have a good late game tank too.
But this tanks need a different strategy than the heavy IS-2.

[Jeff 'Robotnik' W.]

I think there were a few KV tanks which mounted a short barreled 122mm howitzer though, i think they were called KV-9

[Gerrit 'Lord Rommel' G.]

Jeah. But this tank is different from the tank BffWithDEATH suggested and wanted to add
So - different point, different question xD

[BffWithDEATH]

I would still love to see a reward unit ability to call in a single shot from railgun Dora and send it flying at the red line

[Sommarkatze]

Wrong suggestion thread buddy Also the Dora is waaay to inaccurate for COH. Its like designed to blast cities to pieces XD

[BffWithDEATH]

Wrong suggestion thread buddy Also the Dora is waaay to inaccurate for COH. Its like designed to blast cities to pieces XD

Awwwh, come on Hans just wants to give Ivan a Christmas prezzy c'':

[Mr.ious.Q]

I just want to recommend a little suggestion for the Soviet conscripts. At the moment, you've already had the weapon reserve from the armory to unlock full-rifle for each Cons squad and the commissar from the Propaganda doc to get a few more PPShs. I suggest that instead of getting SMGs for Cons so doctrinally, why not making it a universal one ? Like making a consecutive version of "Weapon reserve". In that way, we can exploit the Commissars further by adding bonuses and new abilities to the squad that gets upgraded with him.

[Hendrik 'DarcReaver' S.]

Because conscripts aren't meant as frontline troops by default. They should be replaced by Strelky/guards at some point in the game, and your remaining conscripts should be used as a sort of stronger pioneer unit - construct defenses, ninja cap, flank enemy buildings and throw molos etc.

Propaganda was planned to make you able to play with conscripts alone + doctrinal infantry to replace guars/strelky.

[motorinVK]

The RBT-5 hosted a pair of large artillery rocket launchers, one on each side of the turret. Several designs for extremely wide tracks, including, oddly, wooden 'snowshoes' were tried on BT tanks.

[Jeff 'Robotnik' W.]

The RBT-5 hosted a pair of large artillery rocket launchers, one on each side of the turret. Several designs for extremely wide tracks, including, oddly, wooden 'snowshoes' were tried on BT tanks.

I always thought that would be an interesting unit to see in game

[Gerrit 'Lord Rommel' G.]

The RBT-5 hosted a pair of large artillery rocket launchers, one on each side of the turret. Several designs for extremely wide tracks, including, oddly, wooden 'snowshoes' were tried on BT tanks.

I was never a fan of this RBT-Prototpyes.
I would prefer the BT-7A ingame 

[Jeff 'Robotnik' W.]

The RBT-5 hosted a pair of large artillery rocket launchers, one on each side of the turret. Several designs for extremely wide tracks, including, oddly, wooden 'snowshoes' were tried on BT tanks.

I was never a fan of this RBT-Prototpyes.
I would prefer the BT-7A ingame 

I like that one too