Unit - Reward suggestions thread:

[Mr.ious.Q]

And how do you guys think about the upgrade of light tanks T-70-90 have gaz-202 engine then upgrade in the Armory to Gaz-203 engine ?

[GodlikeDennis]

What the hell would be the point?

[Max 'DonXavi' von B.]

Higher top speed, better acceleration? Honestly, they don't need it.

@Mr.Q: Please stop suggesting things just for the reason of suggesting something. If you suggest things a little more deliberate, that would be fine

[Jeff 'Robotnik' W.]

i kinda like the idea for the 37mm aa gun, probably could be a reward unit for the Zis3 or some other stationary unit

[Mr.ious.Q]

Have you guys considered a  PTRS-41 upgrade or as a reward weapons for the Sov's tank hunter ? Since the PTRS is a semi shooting AT gun and its effective range is 800 m and maximum range is 1,500 m and the PTRD's effective range only 549m but PTRD's weight is less than the PTRS up to 3 kg. So i think they can replace each other cuz the PTRS has speed but for exchange it is much heavier than the PTRD.

[Cranialwizard]

Have you guys considered a  PTRS-41 upgrade or as a reward weapons for the Sov's tank hunter ? Since the PTRS is a semi shooting AT gun and its effective range is 800 m and maximum range is 1,500 m and the PTRD's effective range only 549m but PTRD's weight is less than the PTRS up to 3 kg. So i think they can replace each other cuz the PTRS has speed but for exchange it is much heavier than the PTRD.

Why would you make a reward unit but the only difference is the main weapon...?

Not gonna happen. You shouldn't have to make a squad slower for a semi-auto AT weapon.

This is almost like saying we can replace panzershrecks on grenadiers with AT Rifles as a reward unit.

[Mr.ious.Q]

No i said reward weapon not unit. But the Devs have already made the PTRD model so if not as a reward so should it be an upgrade in the Armory ?

[Desert_Fox]

No i said reward weapon not unit.

Pfff...there's more important stuff to develop than this.

Moreover:

@Mr.Q: Please stop suggesting things just for the reason of suggesting something. If you suggest things a little more deliberate, that would be fine

[Blackbishop]

@Mr.Q
I don't think that would be a nice reward unit.

[Cranialwizard]

Moreover:

@Mr.Q: Please stop suggesting things just for the reason of suggesting something. If you suggest things a little more deliberate, that would be fine

Yea, no offense Mr. Q, but your suggestions are sometimes half-hearted and to the team seem like you just saw it in a movie or game or saw it's picture and decided to suggest it...

Reward "Weapon" or not, as you say, it's not going to happen as it takes time away from the development of more important things.

[Otto Halfhand]

I realize only a limited number of rewards units are contemplated for the Final version of Eastern Front. Is there a reason why all the units developed for the game cannot be included as rewards units until the Mod design is finalized?

[Blackbishop]

Because it's too much stuff .

[Otto Halfhand]

Oh well. That is too bad. It seems a shame to potentially lose all the work that went into the models.

[irik]

I'm not sure what is the reason why, but why wouldn't T-26 work as a t70 reward unit? t26 could be a cheaper, but weaker t70. Or what about the T-26 flame tank? It's basically a not so powerful vehicle but great killing capability.

[Pajeu]

It would be fine if the AT gun (Zis 2 or 3) did has a stealth ability, as a upgrade, for exemple...
P.