Which Soviet Union Doctrine is best to pick?

[irik]

My favorite is Propaganda War Strategy, but I notice that many players pick the Breakthrough Assault Strategy. I love Propaganda War Strategy and when you pick a doctrine, the Propaganda War Strategy looks more encouraging and inspiring. I think you guys would know why.
Come on guys, this is not about flamethrowers. This is about if Propaganda War Strategy is better, or if Breakthrough Assault Strategy is better, or if Urban Combat Strategy is best.

[Akalonor]

I pick Urban, Purely for the Duel Flamethrowers

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

Akalonar, are you a pyromaniac?

I like them all, urban is my favorite though, for the sniper ace.

[Paciat]

If I have 2 early T-34 on the field - breakthru. Mechanics, tank riders, Il-2.

[Akalonor]

Akalonar, are you a pyromaniac?

No What makes you say that ?

Well the Flamers and the sniper ace as well as partisans.Mostly the Duel flamethrowers

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

Akalonar, are you a pyromaniac?

No What makes you say that ?

Oh, I don't know, every time I turn around you are talking about flamethrowers or flame tanks or something on fire.

I think it would be nice to have a flamethrower squad,...

Still you have to admit, a flamethrower squad that doesn't get killed immediately like pioneers would be useful.

But my point is wehr pioneer flamers are too weak,...

...,  Barracks riflesquad, with medium health and one or more flamethrowers...

No one else likes the idea of a strong Flamethrower squad?

 

I still dont see a problem with the flamethrower squad,...

...there was  a OT-28 a flamethrower version (Doctrinal call -in ??)

Yaa A fellow heavy flamethrower enthusiast

  o...k...

Add a flamethrower to make it a OT-28...

...?Flamers in Ostheer could provide elite Anti infantry/building support...Yes pioneers upgraded with flamethrowers can take out buildings/bunkers.....5 min with a flamethrower...

Pz III's W/flamethrower
elite infantry W/ flamethrower .=P

And if any disaggrees with the flamer ways they could ... I don't know.. NOT USE IT?

No panzer IV's , Panzer III Flamethrower would be better.

Do Flamethrowers count as "chemical" in your view ?

I still dont get why everyone hates Flammpanzer Ausf. M

But still do Flamethrowers count as "chemical" ? some used Napalm and napalm is technically a chemical sooo?

FLAMMpanzer Ausf. M    

-Flammtrupp- Heavy flame troops able to deploy  Abwehrflammenwerfer 42 (Flame mine)
350mp 10f 4pop(4man)

-Flammtruppen-Elites-3xMp40's/1xFlamthrower-Can deploy Flame mines(name escapes me)-limit of 5 squads to prevent spamming
400mp
10F
4pop
........

-Pz III-has Flammpanzer upgrade

I pick Urban, Purely for the Duel Flamethrowers

Akalonar, are you a pyromaniac?

No What makes you say that ?

Well the Flamers and the sniper ace as well as partisans.Mostly the Duel flamethrowers

Maybe i'm jumping to conclusions.

[Akalonor]

HAHA I'm tearing up I laughed so hard , didn't expect you to do that, I didn't think I mentioned it THAT much ha ha  21 times ha ha, You missed a couple I am quite sure but 21 is high enough.
But no, I am not a pyromaniac, I just want to see a decent Flame trooper in at least one game, Less pyromaniac more of Flammthrower enthusiast

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

HAHA I'm tearing up I laughed so hard , didn't expect you to do that, I didn't think I mentioned it THAT much ha ha  21 times ha ha, You missed a couple I am quite sure but 21 is high enough.
But no, I am not a pyromaniac, I just want to see a decent Flame trooper in at least one game, Less pyromaniac more of Flammthrower enthusiast

Fair enough, fair enough.