T-28

[ford_prefect]

smaller than everything else Russia has (besides the t-70 and t-90)

[Paciat]

smaller than everything else Russia has (besides the t-70 and t-90)

and T-37a, T-40, T-26, BT-5, BT-7.(almmost the same weight as T-34) Remember that T-28 was build in the mid 30s. In fact only KV and T-35 tanks were hevier.

[Akalonor]

And those two were considered unsuccesful, not so much the KV1 , but the T-35 was considered a nightmare for crews.Thats why I recommended the T-28 instead.

[ford_prefect]

smaller than everything else Russia has (besides the t-70 and t-90)

and T-37a, T-40, T-26, BT-5, BT-7.(almmost the same weight as T-34) Remember that T-28 was build in the mid 30s. In fact only KV and T-35 tanks were hevier.

In game -_-

[Shadowmetroid]

Perhaps as a reward unit, replacing the JS-2...? Or another unit. Ideas, anyone?

[Akalonor]

JS-2 is a heavy tank, Medium should only replace medium, maybe replace  T70's as an early starter.

[Shadowmetroid]

JS-2 is a heavy tank, Medium should only replace medium, maybe replace  T70's as an early starter.

It also has multiple turrets, don't forget. But you're right, It shouldn't replace the JS-2.

[Akalonor]

I would rather have T-28's than T-70's/90's

[ford_prefect]

me too +1

[Paciat]

I would rather have T-28's than T-70's/90's

I would rather have a quick stubby BT-7 than another slow stubby T-28.

[Shadowmetroid]

BT-7 would be an awesome addition, as well. It looks cool, and it's fast to boot!

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

Yes, BT-7s would be good, T-26 isn't a bad idea either.

[comrade2012]

yes, they should