--idea for new soviets tanks--

[Shadowmetroid]

But...it is possible to anitmate?

I really don't see why not. It'll probably be a headache for the devs, but they could do it. Remember McScruff and the T-34!

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

I remember Diablo being really skeptical about it being included ever. Which is sad, but who is to say another mod team might make it. N44 is adding the Soviets, althought they are not known for actually creating the models. All I can say is, it would be a great shame if we never see this beats on CoH battlefields.

[Shadowmetroid]

Eastern Front could be the first COH mod to have tanks with multiple turrets. And you think Relic is watching now...

[Paciat]

How about a SU-122 mobile artillery. It was a unit compareble to StuH but it could be an arti as well(mobile fire base). It was a rare gun but why not?

Or maybe BM-31 rocket louncher. It would fire massive and inaccurate 300mm rockets on short distances (like a walking stuka):

Both units could be a more expensive alternative for BM-13.

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

How about a SU-122 mobile artillery. It was a unit compareble to StuH but it could be an arti as well(mobile fire base). It was a rare gun but why not?

Or maybe BM-31 rocket louncher. It would fire massive and inaccurate 300mm rockets on short distances (like a walking stuka):

Both units could be a more expensive alternative for BM-13.

SU-122 would be nice, although Armoured cars and light tanks should take priority. What about a lend-lease M3 Lee? Lend-leaae M5 halftrack?

[hgghg4]

What if the SU-122 was a Heavy Armored and slow replacement for the KV2? doesn't have a turret and about the same speed but a little more armor. and maybe an AC of some sort to replace the T90 AA tank

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

What if the ISU-122 was a Heavy Armored and slow replacement for the KV2? doesn't have a turret and about the same speed but a little more armor. and maybe an AC of some sort to replace the T90 AA tank

ISU-122 is too similiar to the ISU-152, which we already have.

[Paciat]

What about a lend-lease M3 Lee? Lend-leaae M5 halftrack?

If soviets had more than 1 fraction Lend lease vechicles would probably be included. Now there are just too much of unused soviet home made tanks.

What if the ISU-122 was a Heavy Armored and slow replacement for the KV2? doesn't have a turret and about the same speed but a little more armor. and maybe an AC of some sort to replace the T90 AA tank

It cant be slow(like ISU 152) becouse it was 2 tones lighter than T-34 (same hull). It would be like a StuH. Cromwell speed and armor (harder to hit than T-34 - sherman armor).

[Versedhorison]

The T35 was and always will be a fail tank in real life and in any game. I'm probably gonna add it to my list.

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

The T35 was and always will be a fail tank in real life and in any game. I'm probably gonna add it to my list.

You go and do that.

[guynumber7]

The SU122 was a good vehicile, fast, but with little armor and a heavy STuh like gun.

[hgghg4]

and it wasn't anything like the 152.... its barrel was shorter, smaller and was used more as a Mobile Arty Piece then a Tank Killer....

[Ost_Front_Soldat]

and it wasn't anything like the 152.... its barrel was shorter, smaller and was used more as a Mobile Arty Piece then a Tank Killer....

The ISU-122 is NOT to be confused with the SU-122. You posted it as the "ISU-122", which is an ISU-152 with the 122 mm gun M1931/37 (A-19) instead of the ISU-152's 152 mm howitzer-gun M1937 (ML-20). Ok?

[hgghg4]

oh whoops fixed, thanks for the correction I made a mistake  er rather a tpyo

[Paciat]

The SU122 was a good vehicile, fast, but with little armor and a heavy STuh like gun.

SU122 had more frontal armor and was 2 tones lighter than T-34. The only problem it had was that there was little room inside and it was bad at fighting tanks.