--idea for new soviets tanks--

[250.Inf. Div.]

I like to see this sovits tanks in combat:

su 76
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SU-76   

similar marder 3.

t-26
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-26_tank

could replace the t-70 light tank in any doctrine.

[cephalos]

Su-76 - why not? Fast, light armoured anti tank vehicle. It should be similiar to PE AT halftrack.

[SoccerSpartan]

YES! su 76 would be an awsome tank to have in game and the T-26 would be a great replacement (maybe reward unit) for the t 70

[250.Inf. Div.]

another two interesting units.

152mm br-2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/152_mm_gun_M1935_%28Br-2%29

203mm b-4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/203_mm_howitzer_M1931_%28B-4%29

[PSIHOPAT]

203mm b-4 is awesome.

[funnyme]

Hi,

The su 76 was made by Scruff but dont know if they still have the model though.




Regards
funnyme

[Paciat]

Hi,
The su 76 was made by Scruff but dont know if they still have the model though.

Regards
funnyme

+1 to SU-76. If theres a model allready made than why not use it.

-1 to 152mm and 203mm guns. Russians allready have a firebase.

-1 to T-26. It was much more obsolete than a T-70.

A BT-7 tank is a better idea. Stubby 76mm gun and a very high max speed.

[WartyX]

The SU-76 was going to be used, but due to a serious bug on the model it was pulled in favour of the SU-85. We may see the SU-76 ingame yet.

[BurroDiablo]

We have another SU-76 model, Scruff never got around to skinning it but that's not a massive problem.

[SauerKRAUT]

Actually I have a great idea! Why not a KV-8? The flamethrower tank based off the kv-1 and had a 45mm (very outdated gun but good for light vehicles) on the same axis and then give the ostheer a pIII flampanzer which had a similar set up. Still how hard would it be to code the flames like from the crocodile onto something else and not cause any problems (crashes etc.)

[Paciat]

Actually I have a great idea! Why not a KV-8? The flamethrower tank based off the kv-1 and had a 45mm (very outdated gun but good for light vehicles) on the same axis and then give the ostheer a pIII flampanzer which had a similar set up. Still how hard would it be to code the flames like from the crocodile onto something else and not cause any problems (crashes etc.)

Nice. In 1941 1 of every 10 Soviet tanks kad a flamethrower. Churchill croc is rare so I want to see a KV-8.

[Venoxxis]

Actually I have a great idea! Why not a KV-8? The flamethrower tank based off the kv-1 and had a 45mm (very outdated gun but good for light vehicles) on the same axis and then give the ostheer a pIII flampanzer which had a similar set up. Still how hard would it be to code the flames like from the crocodile onto something else and not cause any problems (crashes etc.)

Nice. In 1941 1 of every 10 Soviet tanks kad a flamethrower. Churchill croc is rare so I want to see a KV-8.

yea its a awsome idea and a great looking vehicle.
maybe as a reward unit for the T-34?

[SauerKRAUT]

Maybe as an additional call in with the urban tree along with/or the kv-2? I think the urban tree needs a little sometin sometin, the kv-2 is way to squish as well as unreliable in killing efficiency, flamethrowers are too expensive until late game until you have some upgrades including sturmovie, partisan camo is bugged/cap slow/expensive man power to ability wise. Their nearest counter parts, the Luftwaffe get defenses, infiltrate, and off maps. Also it could instead become an upgrade for a t34 hull gun, dunno if individual upgrade would be right or even doctrinal (Urban?). What do the devs thin?

[Versedhorison]

Other than cosmetic purposes reward units did not replace doctrine units in Tales of valor. This is most likely for balance reasons and I'd advise not replacing doctrine units in this mod for that reason of balance.

[SauerKRAUT]

like i said it could be something like "Heavy City Combat Group" and give you to get the kv 8 and 2 as 2 separate buttons and costs