That's an idea. They did often end up utilizing flames, which is where my squad comes in. Not enough flammenwerfers? Get some gas, a plunger, a piece of rope, and a match. Anyways, I think they could very easily be made a flame company. In all the others flames play a secondary, sometimes third place role. WM you need the Kampkraft center and support upgrades to make your Flame Pios last. US you get a 3 man squad, but they are generally weak. PE have the flame nades, which is quite expensive. CW don't have any flames EXCEPT for their Royal Scots Engineers, because of the Churchill Croc. The Soviets have to choose the center doctrine (too tired to remember the name) and select the flamer upgrade, then they have to pay 50 munis to get the flamethrowers. Basically, people only use flame in small amounts, simply because it costs so much. By making a faction centered around flame you would make pyros like myself happy. Plus, flames can make a good anti-spam weapon. Suppress and flame.
Instead of this "made up plunger flamethrower" how about the militia gets the ability to use the Eintossflammenwerfer 46, a real disposable flamethrower that was actually used. IT was meant to be cheap and quickly issued, and it was disposable. I was thinking for 20 munis or something one guy would pull out the flamethrower and fire a 6 second or so burst more powerful then the regular flammenwerfer, then throw it away afterwards.
Quote from: guynumber7 on March 11, 2010, 04:07:36 AMInstead of this "made up plunger flamethrower" how about the militia gets the ability to use the Eintossflammenwerfer 46, a real disposable flamethrower that was actually used. IT was meant to be cheap and quickly issued, and it was disposable. I was thinking for 20 munis or something one guy would pull out the flamethrower and fire a 6 second or so burst more powerful then the regular flammenwerfer, then throw it away afterwards.If i got you right here, making a flamethrower useable for amma is one hell of a epic idea.just too creative man Istead of granades, these guys can use flamethrowers for amma o_o ! good work!
Quote from: Venoxxis on March 11, 2010, 12:04:26 PMQuote from: guynumber7 on March 11, 2010, 04:07:36 AMInstead of this "made up plunger flamethrower" how about the militia gets the ability to use the Eintossflammenwerfer 46, a real disposable flamethrower that was actually used. IT was meant to be cheap and quickly issued, and it was disposable. I was thinking for 20 munis or something one guy would pull out the flamethrower and fire a 6 second or so burst more powerful then the regular flammenwerfer, then throw it away afterwards.If i got you right here, making a flamethrower useable for amma is one hell of a epic idea.just too creative man Istead of granades, these guys can use flamethrowers for amma o_o ! good work!I also like it, BUTI hope the ostpioneres (probably 3 man squad that costs 200-250MP) wont be OP vs UK(flamer pio spam).If you can make a 12 man for only 600-750MP(starting unit costs nothing and 100ammo UK would will be in big trouble.Bren carrier could save them, but there are many ways to defeat a bren too (2 motorbikes, faust...)So if ostpioneres will have a Eintossflammenwerfer 46 they need to be weak or very suppresable (even more than vet0 pios and panzer grenadiers)Or maybe this weapon will be usable after an upgrade.
Question-What about the Lion Tank (Lowe) heres a clip of info-Leichter Löwe – crew of five, 1000-hp engine, weight of 76 tons, 100-mm frontal armor, rear-mounted turret, 105 mm L/70 high velocity gun and a coaxial machine gun, top speed 27 km/h.How about as a Doctrinal call-in costs about 1200 Mp with 12 pop??(It stays just barely under 80 ton limit )