Ostheer Vehicle Poll

[Akalonor]

I wonder if it would be possible to modify the 234 to make a 234\4 , that would be awesome it would be a mobile AT gun with 100mm of pen.

[vonhaggon]

 Do you mean the Hetzer? Cause i was talking about jagdpanzer IV Sd. Kfz. 162. tank destroyer. With the 75mm cannon. It could be built or off map call in. I was tougher than the hetzer by far, but entered late in the war. Many were used on the eastern front.

[Paciat]

I wonder if it would be possible to modify the 234 to make a 234\4 , that would be awesome it would be a mobile AT gun with 100mm of pen.

Specify what gun range would this more powerfull Puma have.
Its to mobile to be like a Marder so I think 45 range is fine.
But Id rather see a 234/3 version becouse it would be good vs infantry, emplacements, blobs and still could damage (not kill) Stuarts.

Maybe both would be available after upgrades.

[Venoxxis]

I wonder if it would be possible to modify the 234 to make a 234\4 , that would be awesome it would be a mobile AT gun with 100mm of pen.

Specify what gun range would this more powerfull Puma have.
Its to mobile to be like a Marder so I think 45 range is fine.
But Id rather see a 234/3 version becouse it would be good vs infantry, emplacements, blobs and still could damage (not kill) Stuarts.

Maybe both would be available after upgrades.

Really awesome stuff.
Didnt know about so many modifications of the 234!


The upper one could indeed be the AT gun of the ostheer, but it should be slower than the puma ofc. Thats fits in very well, because the weapon is heavier and the driver has to drive more carefully with this weapon fitted on the top.

The other one is another very interesting idea.. a vehicle like that doesnt exist in CoH yet.




Regards,

-V-

[vonhaggon]

 I agree this is very good stuff, and sound theory as well. The pics and the idea justify the reserch. I would love to see this vehicle on the battlefield in both configs.

[Akalonor]

What do the Developers think ?

[Seeme]

* Everyone stares at akaloner and looks at the door, nothing happens*

[javy52]

its really unfair that the soviets can build as many is-2s as they want and 2 bein more than able to take out a king, when we can only get 1 tiger, or 1 king to combat the is-2 not to mention the other 3 tanks they have thats way to beasty. I say panzers, panthers, tigers, and the elefant. Just my thought.....

[stalkiii]

its really unfair that the soviets can build as many is-2s as they want and 2 bein more than able to take out a king, when we can only get 1 tiger, or 1 king to combat the is-2 not to mention the other 3 tanks they have thats way to beasty. I say panzers, panthers, tigers, and the elefant. Just my thought.....

well you can have as many tigers you want you just need PE on your side wink wink

[Griptonix]

its really unfair that the soviets can build as many is-2s as they want and 2 bein more than able to take out a king, when we can only get 1 tiger, or 1 king to combat the is-2 not to mention the other 3 tanks they have thats way to beasty. I say panzers, panthers, tigers, and the elefant. Just my thought.....

Completely agreed. Just today on Achelous River I finally rebuilt the bridge and attacked with my ally and ran into two of them. They damn near took out all of our panthers and many infantry. The game is really unbalanced without the Ostheer to combat the commies.

[Paciat]

its really unfair that the soviets can build as many is-2s as they want and 2 bein more than able to take out a king, when we can only get 1 tiger, or 1 king to combat the is-2 not to mention the other 3 tanks they have thats way to beasty. I say panzers, panthers, tigers, and the elefant. Just my thought.....

well you can have as many tigers you want you just need PE on your side wink wink

You can have as much Panthers as you want. All of them can have turret MGs and side skirts.

[Zerstörer]

You can have as much Panthers as you want. All of them can have turret MGs and side skirts

+1

its really unfair that the soviets can build as many is-2s as they want and 2 bein more than able to take out a king, when we can only get 1 tiger, or 1 king to combat the is-2 not to mention the other 3 tanks they have thats way to beasty. I say panzers, panthers, tigers, and the elefant. Just my thought.

Strange that sounds...just like what some US player would say about 2 Panthers vs 1 Pershing
Adjust your tactics when the shoe is on the other foot...

Panther and IS2 are roughly the same in every term

[Killar]

Panther and IS2 are roughly the same in every term

Huh? didn´t know that. Which tank then is direct opponent of Tiger I? ISU 152?

[AbhMkh]

I'd definitely like to see the nashorn and the elefant tank destroyers , and the wespe , any of the panzers are fine but historically pz3 should be most accurate

[Griptonix]

Destroyer, I'll take your word for it because you're a developer and know all the technical stuff but it sure as heck doesn't seem like it sometimes. I have adjusted my tactics and can sucessfully beat the Soviet juggernaut.....its just slow and difficult sometimes.