Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Ostheer Vehicle Poll  (Read 29876 times)

Offline hgghg4

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
    • View Profile
Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« on: February 19, 2010, 09:20:45 PM »
I probably opened a can of worms here, but I am curious and maybe the Devs are too, about who would like to see what. I am just putting generic vehicle types IE: Panzer 4 not Panzer 4 Ausf. F to limit the amount of work i needed to make this list...yes I am slightly lazy... you have 8 choices choose wisely

I am going to everything from light vehicles all the way to heavy vehicles including PaKs and mobile arty (Which by CoH standards are considered vehicles), no flaming, no arguing over what is what and what should be what. Also no saying "Why is such and such vehicle not on here" Why? Here is your answer... its stupid, unfeasible or just down right ridiculous... don't question it.... This is completely statistical to possibly help the admins...If there is a legitimate vehicle that is not on here that you would like to see on here PM me. And I swear to god if you send me something stupid like the Jagdtiger, Sturmtiger, Maus, Ratte or Monster I will openly flame you...

Also I am sorry for those of you who voted already but please vote again... and now you can change your votes :D

Offline bastex

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
  • we enforce soviet will
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2010, 12:47:41 AM »
there is already a poll like thiss ...
yes .... im sorry ><
bcouse i was  born as a complete utter bastard

Offline hgghg4

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2010, 03:55:31 AM »
Yes I know I started it... I forgot to check the box that allows people to change votes as I add units to the list... I stated this in the other one AND asked for a Dev Lock

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2010, 01:27:12 PM »
Ferdinand and Elephant should be 1 unit with a cheap (bceouse its a hull MG) upgrade.

Offline BDNeon

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2010, 02:50:42 AM »
Or maybe the upgrade could be tied to the veterancy of the Elefant, with whatever system Ostheer is gonna use for veterancy.

Oh, and since you have AT guns on the list, what about the 7.5-5.5 Pak 41 taper bore gun? Production started in 1942, but was limited to 150 guns because of the shortage of the tungsten that the guns relied on. They were insanely powerful, punching through 171mm of armor at 500 yards. Maybe they could be a unit that costs ammo just to fire its shells, but easily one shots light and medium tanks, and does heavy damage to the likes of the Pershing and IS2.

And what about movable flak weapons, Saving Private Ryan style?
« Last Edit: February 25, 2010, 02:58:52 AM by BDNeon »

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2010, 09:52:15 AM »
Oh, and since you have AT guns on the list, what about the 7.5-5.5 Pak 41 taper bore gun? Production started in 1942, but was limited to 150 guns because of the shortage of the tungsten that the guns relied on. They were insanely powerful, punching through 171mm of armor at 500 yards.
I shot kill is sooo not like coh. Even 17lbs needs 4 shots to destroy a PzIV!
A good player moves his tanks after he gets a first hit but taking no hits is imposible.
Whats wrong with normal 7,5 AT guns with AP shells?

Offline Venoxxis

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • Keep cool.
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2010, 03:56:15 PM »
Oha o.รด
the Tiger I is even more wanted than the Elenfant/Ferdinand
curious!

Its a must have than  :o

Offline hgghg4

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2010, 06:20:05 PM »
I just wish this would get stickified!

Offline Versedhorison

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2010, 03:34:00 AM »
I just wish this would get stickified!

+1

though I am assuming this poll is excluding any possible aircraft or will they be added?

[insert signature here]

Offline hgghg4

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2010, 09:43:58 AM »
This thread is for units that the player will control on the battlefield not Planes or Railway arty...

Offline Versedhorison

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 367
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2010, 09:58:40 AM »
lol railway artillery... well a man can dream.

[insert signature here]

Offline Narizna

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2010, 05:31:55 PM »
the two most i want to see that could be built on the battlefield are:

Panzer 3
Tiger 1

i think it would be fun to be able to make Tiger 1s and have Panzer 3s out in the game now.

-Narizna

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2010, 06:07:27 PM »
the two most i want to see that could be built on the battlefield are:

Panzer 3
Tiger 1
+1
Those are the only non doctrinal tanks I want to see in Ostheer. ;D StugIII and JagdpanzerIV can fill the role of PzIV and Panther.

Quad halftrack can be an Ostheer Puma.

Offline ford_prefect

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1232
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2010, 06:13:06 PM »
I voted for small tanks because I belive the Germans need some of those

Offline guynumber7

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
    • View Profile
Re: Ostheer Vehicle Poll
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2010, 01:57:59 AM »
I think Panzer 2 is a must, it is unique and i haven seen before.