Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers  (Read 6801 times)

Offline ford_prefect

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1232
    • View Profile
Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« on: December 23, 2009, 08:50:51 AM »
I was playing a game and noticed my friend liked tanks so I got the map was red ball express (not my favorite) I got a crap load of these Firefly tanks I never really used them before until then. My friend made a move to take a point with ONE sherman and then I saw 2 panthers, 3 hummels, 1 panzer 4 and a king tiger! I just went for it, then I saw I was winning my 7 fireflys and 1 churchill tank! When the the fight was over I lost 2 fireflys and the churchill. While they lost the hummels the King tiger and 1 panther. Never new that the Commonwealth had such a mighty (and cheap) tank
Logged

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2009, 12:23:38 PM »

 - Well, the Firefly (This one has canadian flag markings!!!) is
 the british Marder3. Xcept it's 2 pop more and has NORMAL
 sherman armor (Less than american +MG sherman)(It's a M2
 not an M4). But it's 140% range and has godly anti tank
 abilities ;) ... ... ... but it's a *LOT* better with the HQ
 cromwell along (around +40% efficiency) ;) Rawr.
 
 ... It's not that cheap. 100 fuel? And it's got less armor
 than regular sherman (Not much though). And it's SPECIALIZED. It sucks against infantry. And up close.
 Think of it as an up-armored Marder3 with a turret ;)

 DO NOT use it as a tank. Let churchill or cromwell (Not
 Leader Crom) take the hits ;)
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline bastex

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
  • we enforce soviet will
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2009, 07:28:49 PM »
1 the sherman firefly was never used by the canadians
2 the sherman firefly has a 17 pounder the ting just ripped the armour of german tanks as long u keep em in the back the germans are screwed (sorry i just had a arty match bhind me i owned the hummel bastards whit my priest =])
3 the remains of the last sherman fireflies are stil to be seen at the rhine river in the netherlands
« Last Edit: December 23, 2009, 11:11:56 PM by bastex »
Logged
yes .... im sorry ><
bcouse i was  born as a complete utter bastard

Offline ford_prefect

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1232
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2009, 08:44:00 PM »
I put one or two churchill infront of them so they could see farther
Logged

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2009, 10:59:16 PM »

 - Sherman Firefly WAS used by Canadians :)
 - Sherman Firefly had a 17 pounder ;) Meep, sowwy! :)
 Yea, keep 'em in back, and use 'em like Marders and Germans
 are screwed. Xcept got average armor and no lockdown and
 1MG, and turret ;) (And +2 pop) THEY NEED THE CROMWELL
 LEADER TO BE GODLY! :)
 They also reload slower if target is too close.
 - Well, not 'the last'... I'd say the last ones are in museums ;)

 
 ** Yea, Churchills are just big shields. That'S what they're
 for. To take the hits while the Firefly do the killing.
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline bastex

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
  • we enforce soviet will
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2009, 11:13:26 PM »
no fireflies where scraped they were poored in to concrete and became heavy at defenses or they came in a musea (i meant in active server u moron)
Logged
yes .... im sorry ><
bcouse i was  born as a complete utter bastard

Offline Newcomer

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2009, 01:41:45 AM »
kinda off topic, but fireflies DO reload faster at range, just cracked open corsix and saw the reload time modifiers:
Distant: 0.65
Long:    0.65
Medium  1
Short     1.2
Logged

Offline ford_prefect

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1232
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2009, 01:47:57 AM »
Quote from: Newcomer on December 24, 2009, 01:41:45 AM
kinda off topic, but fireflies DO reload faster at range, just cracked open corsix and saw the reload time modifiers:
Distant: 0.65
Long:    0.65
Medium  1
Short     1.2
their faster to. LOUP ON THE PARIS CHAT AND YOUR THEIR TO YOUR NOT TALKING TO ME THOUGH MY NAME IS MR.CHENEY!
Logged

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2009, 03:51:22 PM »

 - Bastex : Ah, but you didn't say in ACTIVE service, did you.
 And they were POURED INTO not Poored in to ;) Wouldn't
 know about that. Apparently a lot of panthers had that done
 to them as well. But I figure using regular 17 pounders might
 achieve better results than pouring concrete into tanks...
 besides being expensive, it would have negative happennings
 on the driver and crew :p
 - Newcomer : See, I told you :) Surprise! :) Didn't know?
 Check COH-stats.com the website :)
 - Ford_Prefect : Sorry, I was gone to a party with friends,
 been busy of late, tend to leave my comp online unnatended.
 
 You are there. Or You're there. Not Your their ;)
 Mr.Cheney!? What kind of name is that :)
 ... Wrong place to talk of this, though. Keep threads on
 topic, fool!
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline ford_prefect

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1232
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2009, 07:55:38 PM »
"Ford_Prefect : Sorry, I was gone to a party with friends,
 been busy of late, tend to leave my comp online unnatended."
did you atleast add me?
Logged

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2009, 10:33:12 PM »

 Why, yes. I did.
 
 Man, you sure talk a lot don't you ;)
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline ford_prefect

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1232
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #11 on: December 25, 2009, 03:59:12 AM »
Quote from: Loupblanc on December 24, 2009, 10:33:12 PM

 Why, yes. I did.
 
 Man, you sure talk a lot don't you ;)
lol yes
Logged

Offline Loupblanc

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1294
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #12 on: December 25, 2009, 06:46:55 AM »
 http://www.coh-stats.com/
 
 Look at Firefly stats and compare ;)
 Also, er... yes! The Firefly is better than regular Sherman
 against tanks... but that's all it can do. It's like saying
 The 57mm AT gun is better than the sniper... ... better at
 what? ;)

 I find regular US sherman is WAY more polyvalent :)
« Last Edit: December 25, 2009, 06:48:33 AM by Loupblanc »
Logged
You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their own, are sane. Some of them were born sane. Some of them became sane later in their lives. It is up to people like you and me who are out of our tiny little minds to try and help these people overcome their sanity

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2010, 05:53:14 PM »
Quote from: Loupblanc on December 25, 2009, 06:46:55 AM
http://www.coh-stats.com/
 
 Look at Firefly stats and compare ;)
 Also, er... yes! The Firefly is better than regular Sherman
 against tanks... but that's all it can do. It's like saying
 The 57mm AT gun is better than the sniper... ... better at
 what? ;)
 I find regular US sherman is WAY more polyvalent :)
Nobody said this so Ill just add that Firefly has only 550HP while Shermans/Cromwells have 636HP.
Firefly is also slower than a regular Sherman and much slower in rough terain.
Logged

Offline ford_prefect

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1232
    • View Profile
Re: Commonwealth fireflys VS. two King Tigers
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2010, 01:32:56 AM »
bigger gun.......most german heavy tanks are slow...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »