No more light howitzer or artillery for soviets?

[Darren Marshall]

We can no longer build the field artillery with the Soviets?

[Dreamerbg]

No, too much arty in a single doctrine 

Once upon a time it was a firebase  that was buildable by default

[Darren Marshall]

No, too much arty in a single doctrine 

Once upon a time it was a firebase  that was buildable by default

I think it's better to have a firebase, than a god of war in the defensive doctrine.

[Gerrit 'Lord Rommel' G.]

Nope. With Katjusha artillery and Firebase u had too much pop limited artillery power on the field.
I think we will see the firebase in a reward doctrine

[Darren Marshall]

Nope. With Katjusha artillery and Firebase u had too much pop limited artillery power on the field.
I think we will see the firebase in a reward doctrine

Oh, ok thats good.

[krupp steel]

personally the firebase needs more originality. It reminds me too much of the british howitzer emplacements and the american 105

[Hendrik 'DarcReaver' S.]

personally the firebase needs more originality. It reminds me too much of the british howitzer emplacements and the american 105

Well.. sometimes efficiency is more important than originality. But since soviets received other light artillery options the loss of the firebase is acceptable