Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: [4] Evisela & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair) (Axis Forfeit)  (Read 3634 times)

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
[4] Evisela & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair) (Axis Forfeit)
« on: June 06, 2012, 12:42:34 AM »
Posting for the Duo.

Evisela is the reserve if one of the two don't appear.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2012, 03:58:19 AM by Cranialwizard »
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Dann88

  • Soviet Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2012, 04:34:46 AM »
Here are my shining teeth ;D
I'm drunk now, I'm outranked you in philosophy.

Offline Riggsman

  • Beta Testers
  • Commissar
  • *
  • Posts: 286
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2012, 12:26:12 PM »
Since you failed to conquer Sector 49 (Carpiquet), how can you assault on 36- I wonder. Rules changed during my absence or what? Same thing for Sector 3 (Semois).

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2012, 12:34:07 PM »
Since you failed to conquer Sector 49 (Carpiquet), how can you assault on 36- I wonder. Rules changed during my absence or what? Same thing for Sector 3 (Semois).

This attack is conditional on the win of Sector 49 or Sector 47. If we win either of those two, we can attack #36.

The rule pertaining to this was added during Round 2, but active only for Round 3 and onward.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2012, 10:47:30 PM »
So basically this is a potential battle, not an actual one :P

The rule pertaining to this was added during Round 2, but active only for Round 3 and onward.

Why were we not notified of this? Or at least maybe I wasn't paying attention but why was this not emphasized in the last round (in which Axis as attacking on Round 3)? TBH these new rules are confusing and not posted in the best way. No offense is meant by this. Traditionally your post look like this:

Quote
New rules have been added. Check the rules section

Something like that(I just made it up). IMO that's okay but after saying that you should actually post the rule so everyone reading can see the new rule and not have to hunt for it. So after:
Quote
New rules have been added check the rules
You see this:

Quote
Rule 19:
In an attacking round, you may move through newly conquered territories to attack new positions as well. If a friendly commander is already attacking a territory through the normal rules, and there are none for you to attack, you may move through the territory he is assaulting and declare an attack on a territory adjacent to that one. If you win, you will gain control of that territory and be positioned there on the condition that your ally also takes the territory you moved through to get to yours. (NOTICE: THIS RULE WILL BECOME ACTIVE IN ROUND 3)

It's simply a suggestion :)
« Last Edit: June 06, 2012, 11:00:04 PM by Sir Sharks Alot »

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2012, 11:30:38 PM »
I notified Snug early in Round 2, not sure if he transferred the info along but it's not his fault.

You're right, I should add the rule to notifications, however I stress that people actually read them instead of getting a freebie and sliding by.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2012, 11:47:23 PM »
I notified Snug early in Round 2, not sure if he transferred the info along but it's not his fault.


Im not sure if he is gone :(. I haven't heard from him in a long time(well not that long but u know what I mean :P)

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2012, 12:59:18 AM »
since this new rule is in place, can the axis act upon it on our next turn?


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2012, 02:53:17 AM »
since this new rule is in place, can the axis act upon it on our next turn?

Of course we can :P

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #9 on: June 07, 2012, 03:07:24 AM »
You could have acted upon it since last round
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #10 on: June 07, 2012, 09:32:58 AM »
They actually did make use of this rule so Stealth could attack Kiev.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Glimz & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #11 on: June 07, 2012, 11:06:50 PM »
They actually did make use of this rule so Stealth could attack Kiev.

True.

Ok folks, have we found a day/time?

I'll go find Glimz. I told him to post.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Evisela & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2012, 09:37:49 PM »
Evisela will take over this round as reserve.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Evisela

  • Soviet Commander
  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • "Chaotic action is preferable to orderly inaction"
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Evisela & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2012, 10:32:01 PM »
Want to play a match tonight? maybe in between now and 18:30?

"If all of our plans, hopes, and dreams unfolded just as we wanted them to, life would be a much more dull than it already is."
-Mikhail J. Zelinsky

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: [4] Evisela & Dann88 attacks #36 (Duclair)
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2012, 10:48:05 PM »
Well, if the Axis don't find 2 defenders in 7 hours, there won't be a match, you'll get the win.

EDIT: Sorry guys, I have to call this a Forfeit.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2012, 03:58:43 AM by Cranialwizard »
"Balancers are 10 a penny"