Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?  (Read 3596 times)

Offline bopokippo

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 110
  • Consider me a Russian supremacist...
    • View Profile
Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« on: January 28, 2012, 02:10:16 AM »
Just wondering why you guys chose naval infantry of all things because to be honest I don't really recall many (or any for that matter) decisive battles involving naval infantry. Soviet naval power was not to strong to begin with considering its geographic location so why naval infantry? Maybe shock-troops or something... Just wondering!

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2012, 02:33:25 AM »
Essentially IIRC it was because we had the model and the skin available and we said well why not.

Unless BB can prove me wrong?
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2012, 02:46:20 AM »
IMO Naval Infantry dont really fit in with the Propaganda theme :P. They look cool and all but still :P

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Offline SublimeSnugz

  • Axis Commander
  • Commissar
  • *
  • Posts: 497
  • Zeh fucking truck won't lock down! Its OVAH! . . .
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2012, 02:49:15 AM »
1 They look great
2 They have great coolness factor
3 Naval troops was used ALOT due to the russians had to find additional manpower to fight at the front
4 Its a unique and cool ranger equivalent
5 Its a good replacement for the disgusting trenches
6 Alot of ppl was beggin the forum for them to be included

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2012, 02:52:08 AM »
1 They look great
2 They have great coolness factor
3 Naval troops was used ALOT due to the russians had to find additional manpower to fight at the front
4 Its a unique and cool ranger equivalent
5 Its a good replacement for the disgusting trenches
6 Alot of ppl was beggin the forum for them to be included

Essentially this, and we had the skin handy anyway, so it was a good replacement. Trench Warfare doesn't suit COH too well.
Their SVT-40s + DP-28/PTRD upgrades have them function sort of like a mix between Rangers and Stormtroopers, which in it's own are unique.
Plus, they just look badass.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2012, 03:44:27 AM »
1 They look great
2 They have great coolness factor
3 Naval troops was used ALOT due to the russians had to find additional manpower to fight at the front
4 Its a unique and cool ranger equivalent
5 Its a good replacement for the disgusting trenches
6 Alot of ppl was beggin the forum for them to be included

I should mention they are cool, no? ;D

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"

Chancellor

  • Guest
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2012, 01:34:23 AM »
The most important reason why they're included should be because of gameplay reasons.  Soviets needed a Stormtrooper equivalent to complement the light armor rush tactic, and Naval Infantry fit the bill perfectly.  And yes, they do look badass.

Offline BurroDiablo

  • Developer
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3976
  • NYET!
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2012, 04:24:46 PM »
They saw alot more action than some other units in CoH and EF, we're not trying to create an interactive history lesson here.

Offline Rebel

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2012, 03:54:35 AM »
Historically Soviet Naval Infantry regiments and brigades were used in a number of battles, notably in Stalingrad and Sevastopol.

Offline vikingsteve

  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 26
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2012, 11:30:01 PM »
The Naval Infantry are cool, I just don't like that you are forced to only choose one type of weapon for them. When play at Wehr, I always liked to use 1 Panzer/1 MG34 whenever I was speccing my Panzergrenadiers, and if I am right, the Naval Infantry function similarly. (I don't really use them as often as guards. sometimes I use them for AT)

Killar

  • Guest
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2012, 11:34:31 PM »
You can equip a naval squad with DP28 and PTRD at the same time just as a gren squad with schreck and LMG.

Offline Pac-Fish

  • Axis Commander
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 2494
  • Waka Waka Gluba Gulba
    • View Profile
Re: Why was Naval Infantry Chosen?
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2012, 12:32:43 AM »
The Naval Infantry are cool, I just don't like that you are forced to only choose one type of weapon for them. When play at Wehr, I always liked to use 1 Panzer/1 MG34 whenever I was speccing my Panzergrenadiers, and if I am right, the Naval Infantry function similarly. (I don't really use them as often as guards. sometimes I use them for AT)

They were changed with patch 1.6 ;) Now they can hold 2 different weapons. What Killar said :P.

Om Nom Nom Nom
"Panzer-Guppy ready for battle!"
"Ha Ha Ha! We have the ZEAL!"
"Grenadiers! Fall In!!"