Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2 [1.23]  (Read 7501 times)

Offline Blackbishop

  • Administrator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 12053
  • Community Manager, Programmer and Kicker
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2
« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2010, 08:07:04 PM »
You could make it more accurate against infantry so it snipes more reliably like the panther though I guess.
Its a 122mm naval gun. How about making its aera of effect higher instead of increasing its accuracy?


@SavageWorld  T34/76 has Sherman armor.
T34/85 armor type will be changed in the next patch.
Mors Indecepta

Might controls everything, and without strength you cannot protect anything. Let alone yourself...

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2 [1.23]
« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2010, 01:20:33 AM »
I say accuracy because higher AoE damage would be difficult to balance with small WH squads and we wouldn't want a bunch of mini Tigers running around. The panther is very well balanced against both infantry and tanks and is a nice template for a endgame AT tank.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2 [1.23]
« Reply #17 on: November 29, 2010, 03:28:12 AM »
I say accuracy because higher AoE damage would be difficult to balance with small WH squads and we wouldn't want a bunch of mini Tigers running around. The panther is very well balanced against both infantry and tanks and is a nice template for a endgame AT tank.
Allmost all Allied medium tanks have large AOE. I dont want IS-2 to be as powerfull as the Tiger I, I just want it to have at least the same AOE stats as T-34/85. I alsodont mind rerfing T-34/85 a bit right now (its AOE or accuracy) as they do more dmg than allied tanks, being faster and cheaper too.

If youre comparing IS-2 and Panthers AOE than compare PzIV and T-34/85 AOE. Both german tanks get an MG at vet 2...

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2 [1.23]
« Reply #18 on: November 29, 2010, 07:06:23 AM »
A mostly ineffective MG. Shermans have fantastic AoE while also having a great MG. That argument isn't valid.

The T-34 doesn't really have an impressive AoE so if you want to add that to the IS2 fine. There should be no reason though to add the AoE of a sherman to the anti-tank vehicle.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2 [1.23]
« Reply #19 on: November 29, 2010, 10:22:35 AM »
A mostly ineffective MG. Shermans have fantastic AoE while also having a great MG. That argument isn't valid. The T-34 doesn't really have an impressive AoE so if you want to add that to the IS2 fine.
Sherman is slower, more expensive and has a weaker gun. True their AoE is fantastic but its the same as the T-34/85. (but T-34 gun is 20-25% more powerfull)
The US turret MG is a fraction "trademark" just like British tank commanders or WH armored skirts. Soviets were just known of their big guns and fast tanks.
Quote
There should be no reason though to add the AoE of a Sherman to the anti-tank vehicle.
IS-2 is IMO a do it all breakethru tank. The true AT unit of Soviets is SU-85/100. Same with StugIV if being compared with SU.

Offline Red_Stinger

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2 [1.23]
« Reply #20 on: December 01, 2010, 05:17:05 PM »
You could make it more accurate against infantry so it snipes more reliably like the panther though I guess.
Its a 122mm naval gun. How about making its aera of effect higher instead of increasing its accuracy?


@SavageWorld  T34/76 has Sherman armor.
T34/85 armor type will be changed in the next patch.

I really hope IS-2 will also receive change, because it's kinda weird to have a heavy tank which fire at a low rate, and keep missing its target so often.  :(

I hope also that dev will not raise the muni upkeep of T34/85 (or other tanks) to balance its cost, it would be the wrong answer. IMO the muni upkeep is anyway a bad idea that break the pleasure of playing COH as soviet.
"Du sublime au ridicule, il n'y a qu'un pas"
-Napoléon Bonaparte

Offline Ghost

  • Beta Testers
  • Commissar
  • *
  • Posts: 365
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2 [1.23]
« Reply #21 on: December 01, 2010, 06:04:08 PM »
I really hope IS-2 will also receive change, because it's kinda weird to have a heavy tank which fire at a low rate[...]
that's just realistic, IS-2 was firing very slow because it used 2 seperate parts for ammunition:

[...]used a separate shell and powder charge, resulting in a lower rate of fire and reduced ammunition capacity[...]
Jagd[tiger] is a buildable replacement for the Kettenkrad... It can cloak and cap points. :P

Offline TacticalNuke

  • Guard
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
  • The ultimate in Peace-making technology!
    • View Profile
Re: Comparing T-34/85 with IS-2 [1.23]
« Reply #22 on: December 02, 2010, 12:08:50 AM »
IMO all the IS2 needs is a slightly better accuracy. Its low fire rate balances its high health and damage
I think, therefore I am...
I learn, therefore I advance...
I destroy, that I may endure.