First of all, historically,
I think that the IS-2 is too strong. IS-2 was rather comparable to a panther.
,
This is false. Panther is in no way comparable to an IS-2, it`s like compering a pony with a horse. IS -2 is supposed to be stronger then a Panther because it was build to out-class it. Panther was an extraordinary tank, but firepower/armor/mobility ratio of IS-2 and Panther can not be compared on any level. However, this is true:
Panther, in fact, could destroy the IS-2.
German guns had the best sight`s and optic`s in WW2, combine that with high quality tank and AT guns and that gave them the advantage to shoot first from camouflaged position and relatively safe distance. Panthers and Tigers were the culmination of that approach.
Another thing no one mentions is that you can not compere simply the thickness of the armor, cause no nation used the same formula for metal production, if fact Germany`s 50mm armor plate was far stronger then British 60mm (this was tested and proven by the British).
But let`s leave realism for a moment, this game is not Command&Conquer, you can`t expect to get a direct counter to every unit, "if he has IS-2 I`ll build a Panther and we`R equal " - it doesn`t work that way.
T-34 is weaker then Panther
T-34/85 is weaker the Panther
Su-85/100 can be defeated with little micro by Panther
IS-2 is stronger then a Panther - FACT.
Not every fuc*in unit in game can be defeated by Panther.
If you have dificulties destroying a IS-2 get a Panther with a PaK or some Shrecks and you`ll do fine.
Panzershrecks are more then effective against Russian armor (some may say too effective) - but you don`y see Soviet players bitching about OP, so stop crying over your Panther wrecks - and come up with some new tactics.
...6 days, that`s how long this mod`s out, and everyone is suddenly an expert on balance.