Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: 1.4 ISU vs IS3  (Read 6471 times)

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: 1.4 ISU vs IS3
« Reply #15 on: July 10, 2011, 05:04:59 PM »
GodlikeDennis you said that wehr panzerschrecks were stronger than their PE counterparts. The unit counter shows
wehr
Vehicles 0+6
Tanks    0+6
buildings 0+6
PE
Vehicles 0+8
Tanks    0+8
buildings 0+6
Please explain the anomaly.
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!

Offline Max 'DonXavi' von B.

  • Developer
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3462
  • Eastern Front forever!
    • View Profile
Re: 1.4 ISU vs IS3
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2011, 05:07:14 PM »
These numbers are absolutely inaccurate and only there to show noobs what the current unit that is selected is useful against. It has nothing to do with real stats which I hope Dennis will post here soon.. ;)

Lemberg - Baraque de Fraiture - Smolensk - Heiligenbeil - Nobel Dynamite Works - Lorient - Poltawa

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: 1.4 ISU vs IS3
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2011, 05:40:04 PM »
From memory I think Wehr shreks deal 120 damage and PE shreks deal 85 damage (compared to 70 for bazooka, or 30 for PTRD). All other stats between the shreks are the same except for some target table things against M8s only introduced in 2.602 I think. I can't be bothered to check though. PE offensive vet can increase the damage , accuracy and fire rate substantially though whereas Wehr shreks can't be built or picked up by any units that get offensive benefits from vet, only defensive.

The numbers ingame are completely meaningless. It's extremely annoying repeating that. I hate relic for putting those in.
« Last Edit: July 10, 2011, 05:42:47 PM by GodlikeDennis »
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Paciat

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1206
  • Without balance COH world will end!
    • View Profile
Re: 1.4 ISU vs IS3
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2011, 06:08:22 PM »
From memory I think Wehr shreks deal 120 damage and PE shreks deal 85 damage.
PE shreck does 105 dmg. With 85 dmg it would allways be weaker than wehrmacht Shreck - even at off. vet 3.

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: 1.4 ISU vs IS3
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2011, 08:20:39 PM »
sorry for bothering you. hope you were not too irritated. Your post however makes me understand why the T-34/85 is better against vehicles than the T-34/76. ;D Just glad that I learnt something new.
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!

Offline RedGuard

  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1014
  • Welcome to Axis Front mod
    • View Profile
Re: 1.4 ISU vs IS3
« Reply #20 on: July 10, 2011, 09:40:36 PM »
each level of PE offensive vet grants:


Accuracy  +15%
Reload -10%
Cooldown -10%
Penetration +15%
so at vet 3 times this table times 3, and you receive huge bonus'

so even though the damage is higher for wehr schreks you can see how PE schreks outperform them considerably, with vet.


tank hunter double schreks with offensive vet3 means that you cant even be kited effectively there like snipers
Soviet is OP

Offline Otto Halfhand

  • Donor
  • Mr. Spam
  • *
  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
Re: 1.4 ISU vs IS3
« Reply #21 on: July 10, 2011, 11:43:42 PM »
Tovarich: ISU152 HE shell. Is it better to target the Tiger or Ground attack the Tiger's Tail?

So PGshrek  off vet2 = 112 penetration damage. (I usually go Def-vet1 on PGs for the health regen edge). Off vet3 = 128 penetration damage. Double AT 256 = penetration damage! I guess each shrek targets independently.
孫 The
EF_v1.7.10
子 Art
Illegitimi non Carborundum -"Vinegar" Joe Stilwell
兵 of
Sun Tzu says: In warfare one compels and is not compelled by others
法 War

Offline Tankbuster

  • Allied Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 761
  • I have no anti armor capability!
    • View Profile
Re: 1.4 ISU vs IS3
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2011, 11:34:07 AM »
Tovarich: ISU152 HE shell. Is it better to target the Tiger or Ground attack the Tiger's Tail?

So PGshrek  off vet2 = 112 penetration damage. (I usually go Def-vet1 on PGs for the health regen edge). Off vet3 = 128 penetration damage. Double AT 256 = penetration damage! I guess each shrek targets independently.
If this is true, then that would explain why the grenadiers/panzer grenadiers refer to the Sherman as tin cans.
(un)official forum troll

In Soviet Russia, Forum troll You!