Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DrCashpor

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Bugs & Tech Support / Re: AI dosnt use Pantherturm, Mortar Bunkers.
« on: April 21, 2010, 09:49:06 PM »
Not true m8.

ive been shot down by AI garrisoned Pantherturms looaads of times. you seem cursed or extremely lucky  8)

2
General Discussion / Re: Hey, The Updater!
« on: April 18, 2010, 10:51:21 PM »
could be  ;D

3
General Discussion / Re: pettiton on stupid ideas.
« on: April 15, 2010, 04:59:37 PM »
the large amount off noob feedback and demands slowly starts to brainwash the developers.

4
Its kinda sad that Relic dosent even bother to realease a patch that could make the game more "mod freindly"...

shame on you relic slackers!

5
Balance Discussion / Re: God of war
« on: April 12, 2010, 07:04:40 AM »
I think the problem could be that you arent using the ability for any good ? god of war is imo used when a large enemy blub/army is caught advanceing, if your useing it against 1 garrisoned gren squard its quite useless.

I think the ability works as it should its a quite pain in the a%& sometimes for an Axis player

6
Red Army Suggestions / Re: Red Army AI
« on: April 09, 2010, 05:47:28 PM »
I think theres 3 different play styles the cpu have as soviets.

1 - KAT spam
2 - Partisan Spam
3 - Mech salvage spam

they happen on all difficulties, but the kat spam is just the common one where the other twos are kinda rare, and nasty ^^

Those are the things ive tried so far.

7
Strategy and Tactics / Re: PE vs Russians
« on: April 07, 2010, 10:51:14 PM »
going for panthers asap is a fail in itself imo, Ive been playing alot of PanzerElite its my favorite faction ofcourse i don't know what kind of match you are useing that "asap panther strat" for. In case your thinking about 1v1 i would say don't even bother for a 2x panthers. i would say keep a 2x building combination the whole game, if you have a descent micro theres plenty of coice off very usable units.


8
I know that people on the factory's in Czech sometime did sabotage the german vehicles produced there, wich caused mechanical problems or breakdowns in the field.

9
Ostheer Suggestions / Re: Unit suggestion thread:
« on: April 07, 2010, 11:18:52 AM »
yeah the Brummbär "SturmpanzerIV" was acturally used on the eastern front, in battles like "Kursk - Warsaw uprising" and other skirmishes

i really like the design and i don't see why Sturmtiger lovers wont just satisfi with a brummbär instead?

10
General Discussion / Re: Dead tanks
« on: March 22, 2010, 08:31:53 PM »
i like tanks  :D
I like turtles. :D
I like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles :D

11
Suggestions / Re: SECURING TERRITORY
« on: March 21, 2010, 06:05:14 PM »
It would remove the "Medical Trucks" main purpose, TO heal infantry. people would not be useing it for what it was intended to do then, they would just throw them in the corners in a high res sector to act as a bonus resource thing.

(OFFTOPIC)
I don't understand why people suggest Resource buff abilities all the time, the Red Army is in no lack off extra resources.

12
Off Topic / Re: Favorite map
« on: March 21, 2010, 02:27:12 AM »
In EF.

Tannenberg.

13
Red Army Suggestions / Re: Unit - Reward suggestions thread:
« on: March 20, 2010, 06:10:38 PM »
Buildable dshk instead off Soviet machine gun dugout

Dshk MG - machine gun dugout

The Dshk should act as an antiair Defense similar to the "BOFOS"

Permanent replacement.

14
Red Army Suggestions / Re: Unit - Reward suggestions thread:
« on: March 19, 2010, 11:45:50 AM »
I would like to see a BA 64 replacement for the t90.

This was ment to be a unit suggestion topic ? not a unit discussion, offtopic

15
Balance Discussion / Re: 1.05
« on: March 15, 2010, 10:21:12 PM »
the lack of a systems programmer

So does anyone know where Hawk is? :P

yeah did the guy disappear  :'(  ?

Pages: [1] 2 3