Messages

1

Tech Support / Re: Corsix mod studio problem

« on: August 04, 2017, 10:26:28 PM »

So it seems it's again Corsix fault, since i tried not changing anything and just creating new mod by corsix, then launch it. How do you guys set up new mod? Let's say i want to make my own version of EF (actually it's my own version of Europe at War) for personal uses. What i would do is to copy all the ef/eaw module files and rename to let's say ''bandaro''. Then i would run corsix, choose ''bandaro.module'' and change the parameters to my own. But i met a wall there, because it's protected from saving. It runs though, so it's a step forward compared to the corsix files.

I found something about this in the relicnews archives. It says corsix is outdated since the 2.400 and provided the right module file. Unfortunately download link no longer works

Edit: Solved

2

Tech Support / Re: Corsix mod studio problem

« on: August 04, 2017, 12:22:08 AM »

Thanks for the answer, but I can't really set up the mod. Let's say it's name is FTM. Like in the YouTube guide here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ew7WFJJFas
I followed the steps and added -mod FTM to the CoH shortcut. The only thing is happening is that the game is listed green as launched for few secs in steam, then it closes without any windows popping up. I tried to follow every guide i found on YT or anywhere, but i can't still launch it. Do you know what the problem is?

3

Tech Support / Corsix mod studio problem

« on: August 03, 2017, 06:19:32 PM »

Hello. I want to make some balance changes in certain mod, so i downloaded Corsix mod studio and followed the guide. http://www.corsix.org/cdms/usage-guide-unit-stats-8.html

Unfortunately when i try to launch the mod from the Corsix it runs vCoH. It doesn't matter which .module file i run. My own or EF one or the Europe at War one. It always runs the vCoH. Does anyone know how to solve the problem?

4

Balance Discussion / Re: [1.72]SU vs PE

« on: February 24, 2013, 01:46:34 AM »

Eh, I give up. You've never listened to a single one of my suggestions, nor Simuz's suggestions (which are mostly the same as mine), and the faction suffers for it I'd say.

I won easily with 16 PE on Ango in beta. Camping on fuel -> light tanks -> atgs -> guardians. -> more tanks. No problem with that. More - Rus was op with early guardians + atg's cuz PE had nothing to counter it. We fixed guardians, they will come later.

One question. Why u don't believe us? We have beta and this is really different than 1.7. For example. Russians has weapon reserves for cons on start, light tankovy are cheaper, t2 pools need 50/35.

5

Balance Discussion / Re: [1.72]SU vs PE

« on: February 19, 2013, 12:26:04 AM »

No tank hunters mean no non-doctrinal infantry AT.  I don't like being forced to go Propaganda just for their infantry AT. It's just like removing the Panzerschreck upgrade for Wehrmacht Grenadiers.

Light tanks cost was decreased. Now it is 45 fuel as i remember, not 55. I usually play armor and i don't need propaganda for infantry AT. More, i don't need infantry AT because firstly i have light tanks, then medium tanks/at guns. Also sometimes i go to KW.

Yeah, and because it only has the ZiS2 for AT duties it becomes automatically the new US faction.

You've got light tanks, su-76, doctrinal kw/su-85, doctrinal navals, with russian op on fuel you can have early t-34... (and camping on op and then tanks is really good tactic)

I am, too, starting to question many of these decisions. I get the feeling that Lord Rommel is getting a large hand in balancing, considering how often he is posting to back up these decisions made by the new balance team, something never down when the previous one was in seat.

We're balancers. So we balancing and talking in close-team. Not in forum. I sometimes put post, but i won't always reply about users questions. As i see devs usually do it. Anyway don't worry, the biggest part in balance have people which can play good in CoH.

6

Balance Discussion / Re: [1.72]SU vs PE

« on: February 14, 2013, 01:50:24 PM »

I played a lot of games Rus vs my friend (EXITIITemplariusz, 16 1v1 PE) and PE is better than Rus. His grens can have 10 kills and don't loose a man. AC's are really strong if your enemy is good.

I don't know if it is me, or is Soviet Infantry > PE infantry?

Not in early, but all infantry > PE infantry. US Riflemans have the best vets on infantry in game. Also riflemans have 6x55 hp, pg's 3x55. Wh have vets, strong storms, cross.  Brit have OP blob. Rus have strong cs and guards.

Also, it is easy to get early AT gun and tank hunters which could easily counter the AC rush and even a P4 too.

In next version tank hunters will be delate. Alone ATG can't fight with AC's.

And what are the lvl 1v1 of your opponents?